Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1
    TMAC604's Avatar
    TMAC604 is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    156

    Please review these comments

    1. I am happy with the defense (I wish they played better earlier in the season) I am glad that the top 5 tackles on D arent mainly from the secondary. (only 2 - Last year there were 4)

    2. I am still not happy with Troy Williamson

    3. I hope Birk is ready to go so we can solidify the O-line

    4. Culpepper is our man. I hope the new coaching staff can utilize his talents and minimize the mistakes

    5. The Vikings will not hire Ted Cotrell as the new head coach

    6. I would prefer a free agent running back so we don't put too much pressure on a draft pick. (Look at Williamson)

  2. #2
    ultravikingfan's Avatar
    ultravikingfan is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    24,514

    Re: Please review these comments

    Ok. Now what?

    Do I have to sign something and I get a free T-shirt? :lol:

  3. #3
    skum's Avatar
    skum is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    2,884
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: Please review these comments

    1. Me 2.. we are covering which gives us turnovers, turnovers decides games..

    2. Im Neither, but its rare too see a WR dominate the first year..

    3. Me2.. he's the hear of that line..

    4. Yep.. me2

    5. Of course not.. as others has said, Vikings need to interview one minority coach, so i just think he fills that spot..

    6. me2.. - and then draft Offensive Guard Max Jean-Gilles.. on ABC now.. from Georgia..


    ----
    PUT IN JACKSON!

  4. #4
    MrGopher16's Avatar
    MrGopher16 is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,353

    Re: Please review these comments

    ooooh free T-shirt! Wait is this one of those credit card application things??
    ;-)

  5. #5
    DemonicViking is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    4,161

    Re: Please review these comments

    I think when the Vikings get Williamson more involved next year the results could be satisfying, it also could have been hard to get in more playing time when you had guys like Koren, Marcus and Nate ahead of you on the depth chart.

  6. #6
    muchluv4smoot's Avatar
    muchluv4smoot is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,318

    Re: Please review these comments

    I don't really understand what people expected from williamson? I think pretty much everyone knew he was the one WR in the draft that had the RAW label on him because he just hadn't played in a passing offense yet. It isn't an overnight thing and will take time for him to develope.

    But really, what did we expect a RAW young WR to do in his rookie year, while splitting time with 4 other good WR's, in an offense that was pretty darn crappy, with not very good QB play and no running game to open up the passing game?

    Personally I like what I saw from williamson this year, even though it was very little. I saw a kid that was willing to block and looked much much better at blocking, then I gave him credit for coming out of college. He showed that he can make some tough catches and doesn't have horrible hands. I wouldn't say his hands look like they are great, but for all the grief he was getting in training camp for a few drops, everyone expected him to drop every pass that wasn't perfectly thrown. He also looked like he is gonna develope into a good route runner. He seemed to run very crisp routes from what I saw of him.

    I would start him and burleson next season and give him a bunch of special plays that play to his strengths.

  7. #7
    MensaTice's Avatar
    MensaTice is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,799

    Re: Please review these comments

    This is the strangest title of a thread in awhile. I thought it would be something we'd be asked to remember or maybe some contradicting quotes from someone associated with the Vikings. I guess this was one way to get people to read your random and rather insipid opinions.

    [color=red]

  8. #8
    MrGopher16's Avatar
    MrGopher16 is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,353

    Re: Please review these comments

    "muchluv4smoot" wrote:
    I don't really understand what people expected from williamson? I think pretty much everyone knew he was the one WR in the draft that had the RAW label on him because he just hadn't played in a passing offense yet. It isn't an overnight thing and will take time for him to develope.

    But really, what did we expect a RAW young WR to do in his rookie year, while splitting time with 4 other good WR's, in an offense that was pretty darn crappy, with not very good QB play and no running game to open up the passing game?

    Personally I like what I saw from williamson this year, even though it was very little. I saw a kid that was willing to block and looked much much better at blocking, then I gave him credit for coming out of college. He showed that he can make some tough catches and doesn't have horrible hands. I wouldn't say his hands look like they are great, but for all the grief he was getting in training camp for a few drops, everyone expected him to drop every pass that wasn't perfectly thrown. He also looked like he is gonna develope into a good route runner. He seemed to run very crisp routes from what I saw of him.

    I would start him and burleson next season and give him a bunch of special plays that play to his strengths.

    I think a lot of people expected him to be our replacement for moss, which was a bad expectation to have of a rookie and of someone who isn't moss. Yes he's fast and eventually i can see him being great, but it's hard to find a replacement for randy, especially in williamson because he's shorter and can't do the jump routes in the endzone, that's robinson's job now.
    ;-)

  9. #9
    DemonicViking is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    4,161

    Re: Please review these comments

    Number 5 is a no-brainer.

    It's also gonna take some work on Culpepper's part to limit his mistakes, that is, if he's still here.

  10. #10
    VikingsTw is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,144

    Re: Please review these comments

    Nice post muchluv!

    One of you Williamson haters come out and show yourself. Please tell us what dont you like about williamson. What did he do wrong. All i hear is I DONT LIKE HIM. Wow that was discriptive.

    It could be alot worse, he could be everthing the experts told us he wasn't good at, blocking and catching footballs, like muchluv said he was impressed and so was I.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-10-2007, 10:17 PM
  2. Full Review and Comments on the PP FF draft
    By nzvike in forum Fantasy Football Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-23-2005, 09:11 AM
  3. Strahan comments on MNF
    By ADubya26 in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-06-2005, 10:47 AM
  4. Little Packer Comments
    By Lyssabell in forum Trash the Pack
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-21-2004, 09:39 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •