Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 37
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    137

    Philip Buchanan wants to be traded, why not get him?

    "packmanxxxi" wrote:
    Does Moss still want to be traded? How about him for Buchanon... youd go to the SB next year garunteeed.... and no, im not joking...
    I don't even remember Randy saying he wants to be traded and I doubt we will, it would take a HUGE cap hit if we did trade him.
    0fc1de3e4ff7ffe42e40bba70cebd90c

  2. #12
    packmanxxxi is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    660

    Philip Buchanan wants to be traded, why not get him?

    Well, actually Moss did say that he would never win a SB in MN... guess I would take that as a trade request... unless of course, like on Friday, he just doesnt care...

    lol

    Im messing with ya anyway. No one would want moss...
    3 Straight Division Champs

  3. #13
    PurpleReign's Avatar
    PurpleReign is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    80

    Philip Buchanan wants to be traded, why not get him?

    JESUS FRICKIN CHRIST..........

    For the last time...............

    YOU CAN'T TRADE HOVAN!!!! HE'S A FREE AGENT AFTER THIS YEAR!! :bom:

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    137

    Philip Buchanan wants to be traded, why not get him?

    "packmanxxxi" wrote:
    Well, actually Moss did say that he would never win a SB in MN... guess I would take that as a trade request... unless of course, like on Friday, he just doesnt care...

    lol

    Im messing with ya anyway. No one would want moss...
    I thought he said "It's hard to win a Superbowl in Minnesota"?
    0fc1de3e4ff7ffe42e40bba70cebd90c

  5. #15
    ItalianStallion's Avatar
    ItalianStallion is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,615

    Philip Buchanan wants to be traded, why not get him?

    I'd trade Moss for 3 first round picks, nothing less.

    Seriously though, Buchanon is a good corner, not great. Better than BW, but not as good as Winfield.

    Woodson is great too, but I wouldn't want him if he want to be the highest paid corner, not worth it.


    I m like a Ja Rule poster, cause I'm off the wall.

  6. #16
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Philip Buchanan wants to be traded, why not get him?

    "packmanxxxi" wrote:
    Does Moss still want to be traded? How about him for Buchanon... youd go to the SB next year garunteeed.... and no, im not joking...
    And maybe you guys could trade The Defacator for that dude in baseball who pisses on his hands to make them tougher...enough with the Trade Randy comments...cause it won't happen (much to the chagrin of Packer fans like you).
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

  7. #17
    bleedpurple is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,955

    Philip Buchanan wants to be traded, why not get him?

    Why does everybody on here want to trade all of our good players just to get a mediocre player in return.....

    trading bennett would be stupid! I'm so glad some of you are not GM's or you'd definately run the franchise into the ground faster than Red blindfolded....

    Bennett would be a good spell back as well as a good starter...hopefully he stays healthy..

    We don't need to trade anybody...we need to develop the players we have....sign a few veteran free agents and solidify our schemes and we'll be fine....

    Red has left the franchise in good shape for anyone wishing to buy it..

  8. #18
    muchluv4smoot's Avatar
    muchluv4smoot is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,318

    Philip Buchanan wants to be traded, why not get him?

    "MossWilliamsHenderson" wrote:
    "packmanxxxi" wrote:
    sorry to burst your bubble... but Red is still your owner and Tice is still your coach...

    but its is fun to talk about stuff like this!
    True man but we got Winfield did we? No reason to get Buchanon either!


    Winfield was a FA, so a trade is something totally different. The only reason we got winfield, was because we were so far under the cap, that we had to pay someone a huge contract, to meet the league minimum team salary. That and only that is why Red suddenly seemed not-so-cheap.

  9. #19
    parsongeorge's Avatar
    parsongeorge is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    191

    Philip Buchanan wants to be traded, why not get him?

    "dan3ski" wrote:
    Did anyone notice what Bennett brough to the table last week? He was fast, he did a good job blocking and he was physical what more can you ask of the man? Did you realise that O Smith was deactivated for the game? I must wonder if he failed a drug test! Has anyone noticed that all three of the Viking RB's missed games this year? I say nay to trading Bennet as it does appear he is a good player. As for Hovan his contract is up this year so who would trade for him?
    I couldn't agree with you more..I don't know why all the talk is going around about getting rid of bennet.
    If you keep on doing what you ve done, your gonna keep on getting what you got.

  10. #20
    muchluv4smoot's Avatar
    muchluv4smoot is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,318

    Philip Buchanan wants to be traded, why not get him?

    "bleedpurple" wrote:
    Why does everybody on here want to trade all of our good players just to get a mediocre player in return.....

    trading bennett would be stupid! I'm so glad some of you are not GM's or you'd definately run the franchise into the ground faster than Red blindfolded....

    Bennett would be a good spell back as well as a good starter...hopefully he stays healthy..

    We don't need to trade anybody...we need to develop the players we have....sign a few veteran free agents and solidify our schemes and we'll be fine....

    Red has left the franchise in good shape for anyone wishing to buy it..



    Wait now, bennett is a good player, yet buchanon is mediocre???? If bennett is a good player, then buchanon would certainly be at least a good player as well. That would be a great deal for us. We do have 4 good RB's, why keep 2 sitting on the bench every sunday, when you can get a good player at a position you really need help at?? It doesn't make sense. Improve your starters, in trades for your backups, at least if you have 2 more good backups, that is what makes average teams like us much better.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Pac Man traded
    By singersp in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 05-01-2008, 06:44 AM
  2. Rumors Surface of Philip Rivers Torn ACL
    By Prophet in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 01-23-2008, 01:41 PM
  3. Pep to be traded
    By Redmption in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-20-2006, 06:59 PM
  4. TO Traded????
    By smootpepper in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 05-19-2005, 08:19 PM
  5. Moss Buchanan trade
    By kramer9guy in forum Weekly Opponent Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-17-2005, 12:59 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •