Page 16 of 16 FirstFirst ... 6141516
Results 151 to 159 of 159
  1. #151
    bigbadragz's Avatar
    bigbadragz is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    823

    Re: Peterson should be used more?

    there is enough carries and touches to go around if we just get first downs.
    between kickoffs, receptions, and carries petersen had like 30 touches.
    how much more you wanna give him?
    he's leading the nfl in rushing, he's hitting big plays, and it seems like the offense is opening up.
    to me they are handling it fine.
    i think as the season goes on, which has already started to happen, they will have a more formulaic way of splitting carries, but so far so good.
    the bigger question is how we are gonna get these wrs to not drop 5 balls.
    LET THAT WHICH DOES NOT MATTER, TRULY SLIDE

  2. #152
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,928

    Re: Peterson should be used more?

    "V" wrote:
    All Day.
    1. Press play on first clip.
    2. Mute First clip.
    3. Press play on second clip.

    [youtube=425,350]cRMrGoTGtK4[/youtube]

    [youtube=425,350]2SGTT4sV2VE[/youtube]

    Everytime he scores in the Dome, we should play this.
    Great stuff V.

    Hey for all you guys that wondered, hit pause just before the snap on each play and count how many are in the box.
    Sure isn't 8.
    ;D

    See what a passing game can do when it compliments the run.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  3. #153
    Nebvikefan is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    116

    Re: Peterson should be used more?

    I put this in a Brad Chillress post but it definitley applies here too.
    I just want everyone to hear my words.
    lol.
    Tell me what you think.

    I just have one comment that i want to see about chilly.
    Why doesn't he use more of Adrian Petersen in a flare rout or some screens?
    I would like to see more of that.
    I hear all the talk bout how the vikes will have to run cause they can't pass and blah blah blah.
    The flare and screen is just an extension of the run but it is a pass.
    If the vikes do more of that, in my mind they are running and getting AD more open field opportunitys.
    Give Chester some more runs to make him happy and swing AD out in the flats.
    AD will still get his touches on the run, just open it up a little with the flares and screens to attack a Dallas defence that will no doubt be blitzing their #%Rss off.
    What do you all think?
    "If you need two yards, I'll get you three.
    If you need five yards, I'll get you three.
    "-Leroy Hoard

  4. #154
    V-Unit's Avatar
    V-Unit is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,317

    Re: Peterson should be used more?

    "Nebvikefan" wrote:
    I put this in a Brad Chillress post but it definitley applies here too.
    I just want everyone to hear my words.
    lol.
    Tell me what you think.

    I just have one comment that i want to see about chilly.
    Why doesn't he use more of Adrian Petersen in a flare rout or some screens?
    I would like to see more of that.
    I hear all the talk bout how the vikes will have to run cause they can't pass and blah blah blah.
    The flare and screen is just an extension of the run but it is a pass.
    If the vikes do more of that, in my mind they are running and getting AD more open field opportunitys.
    Give Chester some more runs to make him happy and swing AD out in the flats.
    AD will still get his touches on the run, just open it up a little with the flares and screens to attack a Dallas defence that will no doubt be blitzing their #%Rss off.
    What do you all think?
    He is second on the team in receptions, what more do you want?
    "I hate when threads are destroyed by facts and logic."
    - Prophet


    Thanks Josdin!

  5. #155
    hx38596's Avatar
    hx38596 is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    456

    Re: Peterson should be used more?

    "patistheman" wrote:
    Peterson's ave. yard per carry in the two games Taylor did not play:

    Det 3.3

    KC 4.1

    Peterson's ave. against Atl when Taylor had 3 carries:
    5.4

    Peterson's ave. when Taylor and Peterson split caries pretty evenly:

    GB: CT 8 carries AD 12 caries
    AD 9.3 yds

    CHI: CT 22 carries AD 20 carries
    AD 11.2


    To me it looks like its best they split carries.


    Peterson's ave. with Roy Williams as opposing safety : 2.1 yds

    LOL...
    headed to Dallas now, good luck guys.

  6. #156
    DustinDupont's Avatar
    DustinDupont is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,607

    Re: Peterson should be used more?

    "hx38596" wrote:
    "patistheman" wrote:
    Peterson's ave. yard per carry in the two games Taylor did not play:

    Det 3.3

    KC 4.1

    Peterson's ave. against Atl when Taylor had 3 carries:
    5.4

    Peterson's ave. when Taylor and Peterson split caries pretty evenly:

    GB: CT 8 carries AD 12 caries
    AD 9.3 yds

    CHI: CT 22 carries AD 20 carries
    AD 11.2


    To me it looks like its best they split carries.


    Peterson's ave. with Roy Williams as opposing safety : 2.1 yds

    LOL...

    headed to Dallas now, good luck guys.
    yeah maybe if adrian peterson runs backwards, and i bet roy would still have trouble catching him

  7. #157
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Re: Peterson should be used more?

    []

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  8. #158
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Re: Peterson should be used more?

    []

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  9. #159
    V-Unit's Avatar
    V-Unit is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,317

    Re: Peterson should be used more?

    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    Hey V,

    Wouldn't it be ironic if the KAO turns out to be a run first to set up the throw offense instead of the other way around lol? Whodathunkit?

    Hey Uffda, you have been with me on this one from the start. Mad props to us!

    1-10-MIN 19
    (6:44) 28-A.Peterson right guard to MIN 25 for 6 yards (54-S.Cooper, 57-M.Wilhelm).

    2-4-MIN 25
    (6:44) 28-A.Peterson right end to MIN 35 for 10 yards (56-S.Merriman).

    1-10-MIN 35
    (5:28) 28-A.Peterson left end to MIN 48 for 13 yards (57-M.Wilhelm).

    1-10-MIN 48
    (4:43) 29-C.Taylor right end to SD 45 for 7 yards (76-J.Williams; 74-J.Cesaire).

    2-3-SD 45
    (4:00) 28-A.Peterson right guard to SD 40 for 5 yards (56-S.Merriman, 42-C.Hart).

    1-10-SD 40
    (3:15) 9-B.Bollinger pass deep right to 18-S.Rice for 40 yards, TOUCHDOWN.

    8-R.Longwell extra point is GOOD, Center-46-C.Loeffler, Holder-5-C.Kluwe.
    "I hate when threads are destroyed by facts and logic."
    - Prophet


    Thanks Josdin!

Page 16 of 16 FirstFirst ... 6141516

Similar Threads

  1. Time for Vikings & Peterson to Figure Out Peterson
    By Marrdro in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 09-16-2010, 05:09 PM
  2. Peterson preaches patience - Trying times for Peterson
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 11-07-2008, 12:26 PM
  3. Peterson ?
    By StillPurple in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 08-28-2008, 07:53 AM
  4. Peterson !
    By StillPurple in forum Fantasy Football Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-25-2008, 05:42 AM
  5. thank you peterson
    By All Day in forum Fantasy Football Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-08-2008, 05:31 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •