Thread: Patterson vs Harvin
01-15-2014, 07:20 AM #21
Personally, I don't think there is intelligent life on other planets. Why should other planets be any different from this one?
01-26-2014, 10:36 PM #22
I agree. Harvin was starting to be a very expensive headache. Not good for the team moral. I chuckle when think about the (parts of) two games the Seachickens got out of him this year.Its better to lose the first game than the last one.
01-27-2014, 01:24 PM #23Ring of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
01-27-2014, 02:32 PM #24
Harvin is one of those rare players who will NOT play if he is not 100%...mainly because I think he knows he bruises easily. He has a limited shelf-life, because he is always one hit away from being a commentator.
I expected him to be injured a lot this year, and he did not disappoint. Every year he gets through with people not using the word "bust" to describe him is another multi-million dollar payday for him. He is smart, in my opinion. If YOU knew that you break easy, would you EVER play injured in the slightest?
This was the main reason I celebrated his departure; not because he wasn't talented, but instead because at some point, a team is going to be caught holding the hot potato, and it isn't US!Men are moved by two levers only: fear and self interest.
01-27-2014, 02:39 PM #25
While I hope Denver wins the SB mainly because I hate the Seahawks go after every Viking player or coach, and I can't stand that cocky punk ass Richard Sherman, two guys that definitely don't deserve a ring if the Seahawks do win are Percy Harvin and Sidney Rice. Talk about two overrated and fragile players. Neither one did a damn thing for that team all year, but both will have their hands out waiting for a ring if they do win. I can't stand players like that.
01-27-2014, 04:44 PM #26
01-28-2014, 10:09 AM #27
Punters get rings too, as would Pussy Harven with his combined 8 snaps or whatever it was this year. I will be sick if he makes the play that gives Seattle the win , but that is the kind of player he is.
Go Broncos!!!!Go ahead back up your to close away.
01-28-2014, 02:16 PM #28
Which will win out? Personally, I think the defense usually has the egde, ESPECIALLY in Seattle and/or against QBs that are side-line dependent. Well, they are not in Seattle, and Manning isn't dependent on someone on the side-lines or in the booth giving him the upper hand.
Seattle USUALLY starts slow, but then, so does Manning and the Broncos; but if the Seattle defense isn't slick from the start, I don't think there is any way in HELL Wilson and co can make up 2-3 TDs. Many think that this is going to be a war, and I agree with them; but if it turns into a rout, Seattle might get brow-beat. I just don't see the Seattle offense (this year!!) blowing the Broncos out. They are not built to play that sort of game. They get ahead by 10 or so points and rely on their defense to take advantages of the opposing offense's mistakes.Men are moved by two levers only: fear and self interest.
01-28-2014, 04:52 PM #29
I think Russel will not keep pace with Payton in this one.
Manning will beat the Seacraps D.
Last edited by rockymtdan; 01-28-2014 at 04:57 PM.Go ahead back up your to close away.
01-29-2014, 03:23 PM #30
Seattle on the other hand plays a very simple mano a mano defense with very athletic/physical players. They don't try to fool you with deception, they just play physical and beat the guy across from them. This may be a problem for Peyton....or it may be real easy for him. Don't know but I'm expecting a good game.
For Denver defensively, it's all about stopping Marshawn. Tough task for sure, especially in the playoffs. Another RB gets front billing in today's pass happy league. Warms my heart. Also, another case study that shows how irrelevant blocking and catching are when your that good at running.
I like Denver to win it, especially if they can put up 25+ points. But Peyton will need to have his A game on or it could get ugly.