Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29
  1. #21
    fanofteam is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    182

    Re:Pat Williams undecided on his future

    Flidais wrote:
    fanofteam wrote:
    Well I guess you base you viewpoint on different facts than I do.

    First there was NO WAY a MN court was going to vote to let the NFL suspend the Williams' in December of the best season the team has had in a decade.

    The NFL is not going to back down so this will be settled in the Supreme court which won't have the favortism a MN court had.

    Maybe "Likely" was a bad word at this point but if you think the NFL is backing off ( especially with the Williams' sueing the League) then you are in for a surprise as this is FAR from over
    And if you think the US Supreme Court will decide a case that they are under no obligation to take at all before the end of 2010 season, you're being foolish.

    If Favre comes back, and I think he will, I'm positive he'll convince Pat to come back too. He knows as well as the rest of us do that the defense really needs Pat's emotional leadership.
    I'm sure the NFL doesn't have any pull in getting that case on the docket, lol

  2. #22
    FOT#2 is offline Waterboy
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4

    Re:Pat Williams undecided on his future

    PackSux! wrote:
    fanofteam wrote:
    There is a good chance he will be suspended for some part of the 2010 season so maybe the shorter season will influence his decision
    How do you figure that?

    If the NFL had a case it would of been over and done with over a year ago.

    Yea it would have been over a long time ago, lol
    None

  3. #23
    FOT#2 is offline Waterboy
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4

    Re:Pat Williams undecided on his future

    Midge Resurrected wrote:
    I think he will be back.

    I really hope we get at least one more year out of him.

    As for the suspension talk ... it is not going to happen at this point. Much less a "good chance" is a little overboard I think.

    You still think it's a little overboard ?
    None

  4. #24
    FOT#2 is offline Waterboy
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4

    Re:Pat Williams undecided on his future

    Flidais wrote:


    And if you think the US Supreme Court will decide a case that they are under no obligation to take at all before the end of 2010 season, you're being foolish.
    Really ?
    None

  5. #25
    gregair13's Avatar
    gregair13 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    14,576

    Re:Pat Williams undecided on his future

    One more year please. Not sure if he is a hall of famer, but a superbowl ring would help him get in.
    We're bringing purple back.

  6. #26
    Flidais is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    97

    Re:Pat Williams undecided on his future

    FOT#2 wrote:
    Flidais wrote:


    And if you think the US Supreme Court will decide a case that they are under no obligation to take at all before the end of 2010 season, you're being foolish.
    Really ?
    Didn't you leave/get banned?

    Yes, really.

    "In remanding the statutory claims, this court determined that, because all preempted claims had been dismissed, the court no longer had federal question jurisdiction over the case," Magnuson wrote in his three-page ruling. "Nothing in defendants' submissions today establishes that the court has somehow recovered jurisdiction over plaintiffs' Minnesota statutory claims.

    "Defendants' removal seems calculated only to avoid trial on the merits, and in this court's opinion, borders on abuse of process."
    http://www.twincities.com/sports/ci_14512300

  7. #27
    FOT#2 is offline Waterboy
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4

    Re:Pat Williams undecided on his future

    Flidais wrote:
    FOT#2 wrote:
    Flidais wrote:


    And if you think the US Supreme Court will decide a case that they are under no obligation to take at all before the end of 2010 season, you're being foolish.
    Really ?
    Didn't you leave/get banned?

    Yes, really.

    "In remanding the statutory claims, this court determined that, because all preempted claims had been dismissed, the court no longer had federal question jurisdiction over the case," Magnuson wrote in his three-page ruling. "Nothing in defendants' submissions today establishes that the court has somehow recovered jurisdiction over plaintiffs' Minnesota statutory claims.

    "Defendants' removal seems calculated only to avoid trial on the merits, and in this court's opinion, borders on abuse of process."
    http://www.twincities.com/sports/ci_14512300

    I said it was going to court and they might be suspended. I could care less what court hears it but it looks more and more like I was right.
    None

  8. #28
    ultravikingfan's Avatar
    ultravikingfan is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    24,514

    Re:Pat Williams undecided on his future

    FOT#2 wrote:
    Flidais wrote:
    FOT#2 wrote:
    Flidais wrote:


    And if you think the US Supreme Court will decide a case that they are under no obligation to take at all before the end of 2010 season, you're being foolish.
    Really ?
    Didn't you leave/get banned?

    Yes, really.

    "In remanding the statutory claims, this court determined that, because all preempted claims had been dismissed, the court no longer had federal question jurisdiction over the case," Magnuson wrote in his three-page ruling. "Nothing in defendants' submissions today establishes that the court has somehow recovered jurisdiction over plaintiffs' Minnesota statutory claims.

    "Defendants' removal seems calculated only to avoid trial on the merits, and in this court's opinion, borders on abuse of process."
    http://www.twincities.com/sports/ci_14512300

    I said it was going to court and they might be suspended. I could care less what court hears it but it looks more and more like I was right.
    By again asshat Fanofteam.

    Man...3 bans in 2 days. Awesome.

  9. #29
    ejmat is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,849

    Re:Pat Williams undecided on his future

    ultravikingfan wrote:
    FOT#2 wrote:
    Flidais wrote:
    FOT#2 wrote:
    Flidais wrote:


    And if you think the US Supreme Court will decide a case that they are under no obligation to take at all before the end of 2010 season, you're being foolish.
    Really ?
    Didn't you leave/get banned?

    Yes, really.

    "In remanding the statutory claims, this court determined that, because all preempted claims had been dismissed, the court no longer had federal question jurisdiction over the case," Magnuson wrote in his three-page ruling. "Nothing in defendants' submissions today establishes that the court has somehow recovered jurisdiction over plaintiffs' Minnesota statutory claims.

    "Defendants' removal seems calculated only to avoid trial on the merits, and in this court's opinion, borders on abuse of process."
    http://www.twincities.com/sports/ci_14512300

    I said it was going to court and they might be suspended. I could care less what court hears it but it looks more and more like I was right.
    By again asshat Fanofteam.

    Man...3 bans in 2 days. Awesome.
    That's fucking great. The funny thing is I saw you posted here and I knew it was going to be to bash someone. The ban made it even better. Keep on hammerin'!

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-20-2009, 11:07 AM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-22-2008, 06:19 PM
  3. Anquan Boldin undecided about going to Cardinals Camp
    By singersp in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-16-2008, 04:26 AM
  4. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-02-2008, 06:37 AM
  5. Holcomb will start if Jackson can't - QB for Sunday undecided
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-25-2007, 08:20 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •