Thread: Packs/Lions lost their best DT/ Good for us

I would think packs/lions would do everything to keep their DTs to stop our rushing game but they both let their best DT go and now I can see us having better game against them on the ground unless they replace them. Just thought I would point that out.

It depends on who they replace them with. There are actually teams that can bring in new players and have them contribute without 3 years in the system

The PAckers are probably trying to give Harrell an opportunity, and I don't blame the Lions for getting something for that lazy slob Rogers.

"ItalianStallion" wrote:

The PAckers are probably trying to give Harrell an opportunity, and I don't blame the Lions for getting something for that lazy slob Rogers.

agreed.
Rogers played like crap half the season

AD for the 2000yrds season???? I think so

Well, if AD puts up 250 yards against the lions twice and the cheesedicks twice, he'll have 12 other games to get the last 1,000 yards!! lol

You know, I always believe that teams within the division do things to stop the biggest threat.
One would think that AD is arguably the biggest threat in the division.

Why or why would they then let thier best weapon against him go?

My way of thinking is the guy they let go wasn't needed as they had someone/thing else plugged in to stop the threat.

Have to wait and see.

GB (Probably Harrell)
93 Conrad Bolston DT 23 6-4 300 R Maryland
91 Justin Harrell DT 24 6-4 310 R Tennessee
95 Daniel Muir DT 24 6-2 298 R Kent State
79 Ryan Pickett DT 28 6-2 322 7 Ohio State
[s]99 Corey Williams DT 27 6-4 313 4 Arkansas State [/s]

DT (I have no clue.
I suspect Mcmullet doesn't either.
Wait, Marrinelli makes all the calls right?
;D)
75 Shaun Cody DT 25 6-4 310 3 USC
79 Langston Moore DT 26 6-1 305 3 South Carolina
78 Cory Redding DT 27 6-4 295 5 Texas
[s]-- Shaun Rogers DT 28 6-4 340 7 Texas [/s]

There are no names on that list that worry me. Our o line is better than anything there.