Thread: Packers suck
-
09-25-2004, 10:35 AM #21
Packers suck
Hey, I only said it sounded funny (rhymed too). I didn't compare Pep with Green, nor did I say that Green was the worst. I don't like the fact that Pep fumbles more than the rest of the league, but if you want to compare apples to oranges, then look at the differences between the two positions. QBs are much more vulnerable to strips, slaps and drops than RBs (e.g., bad snaps, pass rush pressure, holding the ball with one hand, etc.). This is not to excuse Pep or any other QB, but all RBs have to do is set up the bread basket, grab the ball and then tuck it under their arms and cradle it by squeezing it tight between their arms and torsos. I would venture that if we charted which percentage of times the ball was handled vs. fumbles that Green would have a higher percentage of fumbles than Pep. Remember, in this calculation, the QB touches the ball on every play, so that alone will make the percentage higher for Green (tough sh*t).
BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
-
09-25-2004, 11:12 AM #22
Packers suck
Gang green, what you gotta say about this?
BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
-
09-25-2004, 11:14 AM #23
Packers suck
I am referring to the quotes that Los highlighted from vikingsalltheway.
BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
-
09-25-2004, 11:14 AM #24
Training Camp
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 21
Packers suck
"vikingsalltheway" wrote:
Yeah, I'm sure he's afraid of big, bad red mullteted Chris Hovan. How many tackles does that wannabe NFL player have this year now?Thats cause they know you guys suck. Favre is a has been. I cant wait to see Hovan deck him out. Just look at the guy he's afraid. He always has that fear in his eyes cause he knows the packers are done and the vikings are up and coming.
-
09-25-2004, 11:16 AM #25
Packers suck
Tackles don't really count, it is more about how high you grade...LOL...just grade, baby!!! Commitment to mediocrity.
BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
-
09-25-2004, 11:21 AM #26
Packers suck
thepacksux, this thread was tailor-made for your screen name. What is your take on the exchange between Los and vikingsallthe way?
BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
-
09-25-2004, 11:53 AM #27
Packers suck
"packmanxxxi" wrote:
Webby hates the pack too so why would he ban me for doing the right thing, bashing the scums of the earth, the packers. Packman go back to your fudgepacker message board."vikingsalltheway" wrote:
Webby banned LovieBear for being an idiot and we leave this young boy??? come on..."LosAngelis" wrote:
Ok blow some more goats for me man like you people in wisconsin do. Your packers suck. You see that game against the bears LOL that was awesome. Too bad Favre didnt break his thumb.Dude, what are you, 12?
"You guys suck" We're both 1-1.
"Favre is a has been" Someday, but not today.
"I can't wait to see Hovan deck him out" Is he a Christmas tree?
"Just look at the guy he's afraid" I am afraid of run-on sentences.
"He always has that fear in his eyes" Might be Visine.
"cause he knows the Packers are done and the Vikings are up and coming" Someday, but not today.
Also- cajun.. funny how you rip on Ahman for fumbling when you have a player who has more fumbles than games played...lol look in the mirror first bud982be7163de23b12be0039fa7de5b166
-
09-25-2004, 12:26 PM #28
Packers suck
Ahman does have troubles with fumbles, but it is always at the beginning of the season. The one against Chicago was, unfortunately, very costly and high profile.
In his GB career, he has:
2000: 4 lost fumbles
2001: 4 lost fumbles
2002: 3 lost fumbles
2003: 5 lost fumbles
However, look at his touches:
2000: 336 touches (lost once per 84 touches)
2001: 366 touches (lost once per 91.5 touches)
2002: 343 touches (lost once per 114 touches)
2003: 405 touches (lost once per 81 touches)
This was his first lost fumble in 61 touches this season.
In 2003, he did not lose a fumble after week 9, and in 2002 he did not lose a fumble after week 7.
We play Minnesota in Week 10 this year.Have you ever seen a race of turtles, and they all go the wrong way instead of towards the finish line?
Welcome to the NFC North.
-
09-25-2004, 12:36 PM #29
Packers suck
Los -- you have to admit that 17 fumbles for an RB in just 4 seasons is a lot. Running backs are expected to hold onto the ball.
Nothing personal against Green, he is a great back besides the fumbling problem.
Duante needs to hold onto the ball too, but that's a whole different story.Skol!
Go Vikings!
-
09-25-2004, 12:39 PM #30
Asst. Coach
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 582
Packers suck
some culpepper came from the blindsiding sacks i sometimes he will drop the ball but rb and qb differnt postion
lets talk favre intsHere s the most important thing: You can NEVER lose your sense of humor. Without that, you ve got NOTHING. (Divinci) James Belushi
Similar Threads
-
packers suck mad a^^
By whiteboy in forum Free Beer!Replies: 16Last Post: 09-08-2005, 10:19 PM -
The Packers suck
By vikingsalltheway in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 9Last Post: 04-30-2004, 06:51 PM -
Packers Suck
By vikesppe80 in forum Trash the PackReplies: 12Last Post: 11-02-2003, 09:56 PM -
Packers Suck Ass!
By Bomb2Moss in forum Trash the PackReplies: 0Last Post: 11-17-2002, 07:27 AM -
Packers Suck
By Webby in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 1Last Post: 02-25-2002, 11:51 AM



Reply With Quote





Bookmarks