Offord is switched back to strong safety

**Braddock** · 07-29-2006, 11:00 PM

"thetrenches68OL" wrote:

tank has that spot locked down

I wouldn't count my chickens before they hatch... If we signed another safety, it's because the coaches felt like it was necessary. There have been some rumblings of the staff's discontent..... we'll see.

**singersp** · 07-30-2006, 01:15 AM

"Braddock" wrote:

"thetrenches68OL" wrote:

tank has that spot locked down

I wouldn't count my chickens before they hatch... If we signed another safety, it's because the coaches felt like it was necessary. There have been some rumblings of the staff's discontent..... we'll see.

Where have you read there was rumblings of dicontent?

I've read nothing about it. Has anyone else?

**VKG4LFE** · 07-30-2006, 01:25 AM

I just hope our safeties don't disappoint! Heck our entire defensive backfield for that matter!

**singersp** · 07-30-2006, 01:40 AM

"thetrenches68OL" wrote:

tank has that spot locked down

Tank hasn't got anything locked down yet.
How do you know who or what the coaches have in mind?
Offord could very well win that starting role.
Nothing is a lock until the coaches say it is a lock.
Good to see some competition at just about all our secondary positions.
Safety positions, DB's & at the linebacker postions.

**oddmanout22287** · 07-30-2006, 02:12 AM

"singersp" wrote:

"thetrenches68OL" wrote:

tank has that spot locked down

Tank hasn't got anything locked down yet.
How do you know who or what the coaches have in mind?
Offord could very well win that starting role.
Nothing is a lock until the coaches say it is a lock.
Good to see some competition at just about all our secondary positions.
Safety positions, DB's & at the linebacker postions.

I agree with Singer.
Competition=goood.
So are paragraphs.
Woot. :razz: