i know we need recievers, but you can't waste a first rounder on one. another d end?
Printable View
i know we need recievers, but you can't waste a first rounder on one. another d end?
It's not over.
Jeez.
::)
Topic of the year.
"ultravikingfan" wrote:
Ultra is right, it isn't over yet.Quote:
It's not over.
Jeez.
::)
Topic of the year.
But we draft a QB
;)
It is over, and im thinking a QB too. Have a vet next year and wait on the rookie a few years
"baumy300" wrote:
i don't think washington is going to stumble against dallas' second team, and our staff hasn't figured out a way to beat 8-9 man fronts.Quote:
"ultravikingfan" wrote:
Ultra is right, it isn't over yet.Quote:
It's not over.
Jeez.
::)
Topic of the year.
But we draft a QB
;)
i still have hope tjack will work out. but a developement qb would not hurt. we could still use a decent back-up qb(free agency?)
pass rusher perhaps?
WR first, CB second, TE third.
and the season is nto over yet, so i hate this topic and the topic creator.
Hey, Brad Johnson may beat the Skins next week
:P
"gregair13" wrote:
Sweet! Who's going to throw it to him though?Quote:
WR first, CB second, TE third.
and the season is nto over yet, so i hate this topic and the topic creator.
"CCthebest" wrote:
With pick #17!?!?!?Quote:
It is over, and im thinking a QB too. Have a vet next year and wait on the rookie a few years
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA HA [size=18pt]YOU'RE A F|_|CKING IDIOT!!!![/size]
How the hell is that any different from playing a second-rounder in his second year as a starter?
If we get a vet, let's stick with Jackson and draft the best player available.
http://www.purplepride.org/forums/Th...s/warnwarn.gif
The Golden Rule
http://www.purplepride.org/forums/index.php?topic=40927.msg696264#msg696264
You guys are stupid for thinking the season's not over.