Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    969

    NFL Report Cards

    They gave The VIkes a D+ ....I wouldnt disagree.... intresting read





    http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=cr-grades010207&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

  2. #2
    VikesfaninWis's Avatar
    VikesfaninWis is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    5,055

    Re: NFL Report Cards

    I wouldn't disagree either... They flat out disappointed. With the guys they signed, they are lucky they got a D+...IMO..

  3. #3
    Caine's Avatar
    Caine is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    5,139

    Re: NFL Report Cards

    Actually I would have graded them lower.
    We lost a LOT og games we should have won, never adjusted to our weaknesses, and never improved our sloppy play and penalties.
    I would have gone with the full blown "F".

    Caine

  4. #4
    Mystophales is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    54

    Re: NFL Report Cards

    There were more than a few games we lost that we could have won so I certainly wouldn't disagree with a grade below average. There is a lot of talent on this team to only come away with 6 wins. Edgerrin actually made a pretty damn good point in the opening of that article. There is tons of talent on paper..

  5. #5
    bono's Avatar
    bono is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,544

    Re: NFL Report Cards

    My Packers got a B-!!!!!!!!!! I'd agree because, the Packers boosted pass critics' expectations. I highly doubt that 1/4 of society thought the Packers would be in a position where they could possibly clinch a post-season entrance. Wow! My boys actually had a fair record (8-8, .500) this season...better than more than enough teams, ya dig?!
    BonoSugaRay IS Betamethasone Dunkin

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    969

    Re: NFL Report Cards

    "bono" wrote:
    My Packers got a B-!!!!!!!!!! I'd agree because, the Packers boosted pass critics' expectations. I highly doubt that 1/4 of society thought the Packers would be in a position where they could possibly clinch a post-season entrance. Wow! My boys actually had a fair record (8-8, .500) this season...better than more than enough teams, ya dig?!
    ya i must admit the packers pulled off a great season as much as it pains me to say that lol......but ya they were sporadic at times but really pulled off a great record for the talent level they had

  7. #7
    Mystophales is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    54

    Re: NFL Report Cards

    "bono" wrote:
    My Packers got a B-!!!!!!!!!! I'd agree because, the Packers boosted pass critics' expectations. I highly doubt that 1/4 of society thought the Packers would be in a position where they could possibly clinch a post-season entrance. Wow! My boys actually had a fair record (8-8, .500) this season...better than more than enough teams, ya dig?!
    As much as it pains me to say it Brett really carried that team this year. Without him I think they would have been lucky to win 3 games. Man I hate giving credit to Favre.. :-X

Similar Threads

  1. NFL Mid Term Report Cards
    By Marrdro in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-30-2008, 11:08 AM
  2. Cards
    By VikesFan787 in forum Tix & Such
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-03-2006, 03:31 PM
  3. DANG! Pink Taco Stadium not in the Cards for the Cards!
    By cajunvike in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-26-2006, 04:23 PM
  4. Offseason Report Cards
    By Prophet in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-27-2006, 11:02 PM
  5. Trading cards
    By JimFlyinsaucer in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-07-2004, 12:19 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •