Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,207

    NFC North: Black and Blue Again?

    [size=18px]Black and Blue Again?[/size]

    August 10, 2006

    Author: Mike Trudell

    Let's get this truth out of the way up front: preseason predictions in the NFL carry about as much weight as He-Man in a political debate. However, that won't stop a plethora of media saturation in the prognosis arena, this in a game both marked by parity and traditionally much less predictable than its fellow major sports. Alas, we're here to feed the beast another meal.

    Don't sleep on the NFC North in 2006.

    National attention has centered on the power divisions of 2005, including the NFC East and AFC North. Based on last year's records and the retaining of talent, this is not unfair. Yet several publications, including Minnesota's own Pioneer Press, have suggested that the Vikings, Chicago Bears and Green Bay Packers have three of the league's four easiest schedules in 2006. This relying heavily upon the fact that the NFC North plays the NFC West this season, and of course, that each team plays twice within their respective divisions. Both divisions have been called relatively weak.

    Not so fast.

    "The NFC North is always a tough division," said Vikings offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell, who spent his previous six seasons coaching the Green Bay Packers. "It's the black and blue division where the teams always beat each other up and knock each other around pretty well. When other teams leave, they're beat up."

    "It's funny how people are underrating the NFC North," said Vikings quarterback Brad Johnson, 7-2 as Minnesota's starter last season. "I think it's one of the tougher divisions."

    Break it down for us, Brad...

    The Pack: "Green Bay had a disappointing year, but they had won three division titles before that, and lost six games by three points or less last year," explained Johnson. "They made a few moves defensively, especially bringing in (cornerback) Charles Woodson, and (quarterback) Brett Favre will come back with vengeance this year."

    Da Bears: "Chicago should be just as good as they were last year. That defense is still very strong."

    The Lions: "They brought in (head coach) Rod Marinelli, who was a defensive coach for us when I was in Tampa Bay, and he is going to put his stamp on that team. Also, they brought in Mike Martz at offensive coordinator."

    The Vikes: "We made a lot of moves, from coaching changes to our scheme, to bringing in a lot of different players. Offensively with the skill position guys it's the same at receiver, but you bring in (running back) Chester Taylor, and three new lineman with (center) Matt Birk having a year off, (left guard) Steve Hutchinson coming in from Seattle, and (right guard) Artis Hicks coming in from Philadelphia. Our guys are coming together, and we have some proven players. I feel great going into it."

    Thanks Brad, that's a good start. Let's dig deeper. Numbers, anyone?

    Look how last year's divisions stacked up in terms of records:

    t1) NFC East/AFC West (36-28)
    2) AFC North (34-30)
    3) NFC South (33-31)
    4) AFC South (32-32)
    5) NFC North (29-35)
    t6) NFC West/AFC East (28-36)

    Again, here's from where the strength of schedule predictions for 2006 come. Yet, last year's best division and this year's popular choice for top dog, the NFC East, was 31-33 in 2004. In addition, 2004's top division, the AFC East (37-27), finished tied with the worst record in 2005.

    The worst division in football in the last two years has been the aforementioned, pass-oriented NFC West, with a combined 53 wins to 75 losses. Minnesota's newly acquired defensive tackle Ross Kolodziej spent his last two seasons in the NFC West, totaling 44 tackles and four sacks for the Arizona Cardinals. He said he much prefers the hard nosed, grinding North to the pass-heavy West.

    "It's going to be a tough, tough division this year, no question," said Kolodziej. "You have the Bears on top, and the conference championship goes through Chicago. But you have to factor in the other teams as well, because Green Bay is going to be much improved.

    "Detroit has a stable of talent in there, and Marinelli brings them instant credibility. He's a hard-nosed coach, and I think that's what he's going to try and get going over there. It's going to be a grind, week in and week out."

    The North has a solid stable of talent both new and old for the 2006 campaign: Charles Woodson is a former Heisman trophy winner; Brian Urlacher was the NFL's Defensive Player of the Year in 2005; Roy Williams has a rare combination of speed and power; Steve Hutchinson is probably the best guard in the NFL.

    Though with a touch of hyperbole, Brett Favre declared his team the most talented he has seen in Green Bay. But ESPN's John Clayton confirmed the improved crop of players in cheese land after spending time at Packers training camp. The Bears return all 11 starters to one of the NFL's best defenses in 2005, have a healthy starting quarterback in Rex Grossman, and one of the league's top backup signal callers, Brian Griese. On paper, the Vikings are among the NFL's best on both sides of the trenches.

    "The NFC North is about an old school, power running game with ball control and stingy defense," said Kolodziej. "That's really the roots of football, the cradle of where the game originated. This is a division that's true to the roots of the game, where you have to bring your hard hat for some power football."

    Furthermore, it certainly isn't easy to march into an NFC North stadium and get a road victory.

    "Guys play hard, and there are some tough venues to play in, like the Metrodome, Lambeau Field, and Soldier Field," said Bevell. "There are great traditions at each place, so it's a tough division."

    While it can be readily acknowledged that this is yet another flotation device in the sea of predictions, it at least supports the opinions of a former Super Bowl-winning quarterback witnessing his 15th NFL preseason.

    Mr. Johnson, a conclusion please:

    "Our division is probably not getting a lot of attention, but I expect it to be one of the better divisions in football."

    Black and Blue Again?

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  2. #2
    VikesfaninWis's Avatar
    VikesfaninWis is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    5,053

    Re: NFC North: Black and Blue Again?

    Our division is probably not getting a lot of attention, but I expect it to be one of the better divisions in football."


    With the Vikings on top.. :lol:

  3. #3
    ejmat is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,849

    Re: NFC North: Black and Blue Again?

    Yeah, this is pretty much what I've said all along. We know what Chicago can bring. Lions seem to be improved on paper and a new coaching staff. The Pack (as much as we hate to admit it) did lose a lot of close games last year and they were extremely injured. They got a couple of key players back and picked up Hawk in the draft and Woodson. Not that I'm a big fan of Woodson but those to do improve the defense from last year. Then there's us. Our main issue last year was the front line. We know that's improved plus we picked up Tony Richardson. that should give Brad time to throw and open up holes for Taylor, Memo, and Fason. On the defensive side I honestly believe the defensive line and the secondary are one of the best in the league respectively. The linebacking crew is somewhat unproven but there is a lot of talent there. If this team gells they can be a big surprise.

  4. #4
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,207

    Re: NFC North: Black and Blue Again?

    "ejmat" wrote:
    ........The Pack (as much as we hate to admit it) did lose a lot of close games last year and they were extremely injured. They got a couple of key players back and picked up Hawk in the draft and Woodson. Not that I'm a big fan of Woodson but those two do improve the defense from last year......
    Pee Wee Herman would improve their team from last year.

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  5. #5
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,601
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: NFC North: Black and Blue Again?

    Again, here's from where the strength of schedule predictions for 2006 come. Yet, last year's best division and this year's popular choice for top dog, the NFC East, was 31-33 in 2004. In addition, 2004's top division, the AFC East (37-27), finished tied with the worst record in 2005.
    This nicely sums up strength of schedule predictions. Going of from the previous year's stats simply isn't a valid way to predict scheudle strength.
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=

  6. #6
    tastywaves's Avatar
    tastywaves is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,815

    Re: NFC North: Black and Blue Again?

    He needs to work on is math a little bit. NFC North would be 6 out of 8, not 5. With Chicago, MN and Green Bay focusing more on defense, I do see a lot more old school "black and blue" style football this year with the North.

    With Childress' focus on line play we should see very physical football from the Vikes this year. Bring on outdoor games with 30 below temps, and we've got our identity back.

  7. #7
    petrodemos's Avatar
    petrodemos is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    664

    Re: NFC North: Black and Blue Again?

    offensively the pack upgraded too
    billy cundiff is way better than longwell!
    and OT flanagan blows too, good ridance. replaced by....uh...who replaced him? thats alright, we only need a 4 man line with favre at the helm!

    seriously though, ahman green is back and that will help, but their offensive line is terrible, how they expect to run or pass behind that line i dont know.

  8. #8
    oakmage's Avatar
    oakmage is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    193

    Re: NFC North: Black and Blue Again?

    "singersp" wrote:
    "ejmat" wrote:
    ........The Pack (as much as we hate to admit it) did lose a lot of close games last year and they were extremely injured. They got a couple of key players back and picked up Hawk in the draft and Woodson. Not that I'm a big fan of Woodson but those two do improve the defense from last year......
    Pee Wee Herman would improve their team from last year.
    I did not know he was that desperate for a job as to play for the Packers :lol:

  9. #9
    Json is offline GM
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,109

    Re: NFC North: Black and Blue Again?

    No Pee Wee jokes please. He was my idol when I was a child

  10. #10
    illiniviking's Avatar
    illiniviking is offline Waterboy
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    10

    Re: NFC North: Black and Blue Again?

    I look for Chicago to struggle a bit this year. Carolina really exposed them on how they can be beat and they really haven't made any improvements in the secondary. Charles Tillman can be had and I'm not sure how good Ricky Manning is. I think the Vikings are the cream of the NFC north this year.

Similar Threads

  1. The Boy in Black
    By Garland Greene in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-15-2009, 08:52 PM
  2. Black and Blue review
    By singersp in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-09-2007, 09:09 AM
  3. Black KKK???
    By PurplePlain in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-02-2007, 06:30 AM
  4. Black and Blue Again?
    By cogitans in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-10-2006, 07:29 PM
  5. Man in Black
    By Prophet in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-26-2006, 08:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •