Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 61
  1. #11
    VikesfaninWis's Avatar
    VikesfaninWis is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    5,055

    Re: With Nate gone, who will be our starting WR's?

    I see K-Rob and Taylor starting, but if T-Will plays lights out, he could very well be the starter opposite K-Rob. He has that great YAC speed that the WCO runs. Childress is high on him for a reason..

  2. #12
    DaunteHOF is offline Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,096

    Re: With Nate gone, who will be our starting WR's?

    2 words. Troy Williamson. Nuff Said.
    Its not braggin if you can do it!!!

  3. #13
    olson_10's Avatar
    olson_10 is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    4,215

    Re: With Nate gone, who will be our starting WR's?

    marcus and koren
    People who see life as anything more than pure entertainment are missing the point.

  4. #14
    Packkill3r is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    30

    Re: With Nate gone, who will be our starting WR's?

    Jermaine Wiggins and Kleinsasser will be our leading receivers!!!!!!

  5. #15
    jkjuggalo's Avatar
    jkjuggalo is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,131

    Re: With Nate gone, who will be our starting WR's?

    It will be K-rob and Troy w/ Taylor in the slot and Marcus getting a lot of red zone action. Depending on injury, this could change at any time, and Jermaine will be first or second in receptions.
    Rock out with your cock out!!!

  6. #16
    NordicNed is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    9,513

    Re: With Nate gone, who will be our starting WR's?

    I'm going to say, when camp is over and it's time to kick the pig skin, K-Rob will be our new #1 with Troy coming in at the new #2 reciever for us.

    TT will our slot reciever, and be replaced at times by M.Rob when we get in the red zone...

    I'm excited about our new line-up to be.......

    We will also be seeing plenty of "The Sauce" and "Wiggy" also.

    And let's not forget, we are going to have some RB's with some good hands, coming out of the backfield, then dazzeling us with their after the catch "Shake Um and Bake Um Moves" ala Taylor and MM


    I LOVE THE SMELL OF VICTORY IN THE MORNING AIR.

  7. #17
    norseforce's Avatar
    norseforce is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    149

    Re: With Nate gone, who will be our starting WR's?

    I like our recv. troy could be our #1 by opening day, m robinson wont even be on the team,they said he was not invited to the workouts were going through right now,

  8. #18
    norseforce's Avatar
    norseforce is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    149

    Re: With Nate gone, who will be our starting WR's?

    "VikingNed" wrote:
    I'm going to say, when camp is over and it's time to kick the pig skin, K-Rob will be our new #1 with Troy coming in at the new #2 reciever for us.

    TT will our slot reciever, and be replaced at times by M.Rob when we get in the red zone...

    I'm excited about our new line-up to be.......

    We will also be seeing plenty of "The Sauce" and "Wiggy" also.

    And let's not forget, we are going to have some RB's with some good hands, coming out of the backfield, then dazzeling us with their after the catch "Shake Um and Bake Um Moves" ala Taylor and MM
    totally right , EXTRA K-SAUCE with some wiggy to, west coast is heavy on the fullback swing dumpoff plays

  9. #19
    norseforce's Avatar
    norseforce is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    149

    Re: With Nate gone, who will be our starting WR's?

    I hope we get the ONTERIO back, he's way better than mm, but it's nice to have both

  10. #20
    UTVikfan's Avatar
    UTVikfan is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    814

    Re: With Nate gone, who will be our starting WR's?

    Childress has a very, very nice "problem" here decideing who to start. We have a very sold crew of WR's, even with Nate gone.

    I am thinking KRob and TWill by the time the season starts. Most of all, I wanna see time for all of them. Not a bad one in the bunch.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Ranking the best WR's in the NFL
    By DaVizzles in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 01-06-2008, 09:26 AM
  2. Starting WR's
    By DaVizzles in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 79
    Last Post: 05-16-2007, 04:39 PM
  3. Best 3 WR's after CJ
    By Garland Greene in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-17-2007, 07:27 AM
  4. why do people think we need wr's?
    By mr.woo in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 02-27-2006, 01:06 AM
  5. WR's.........
    By slowlow in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 03-17-2005, 04:21 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •