Nate Burleson vs Tory James:Travis Taylor vs Deltha O'Neal

**Jordan** · 09-17-2005, 05:39 PM

This is a huge advantage for us i think if Daunte can get in a groove vs their secondary he should have a huge day, and I think our secondary will ruff up Chad Johnson just like the browns did a year ago when he gave their secondary pepto-bismol(lol).

**michaelmazid** · 09-17-2005, 05:42 PM

I can see Nate doing good but Delta Oneal is a pretty solid corner and he should be able to shut down Travis Taylor easily.

**PurplePeopleEaters** · 09-17-2005, 05:46 PM

Both are pretty solid corners. They match up well.

**ItalianStallion** · 09-17-2005, 05:46 PM

Deltha O'Neil is a big play corner in both senses of the term. If Culpepper can avoid throwing INTs I think Taylor can have some success against him.

**lilvikes33** · 09-17-2005, 05:57 PM

see the key is that these corners will not be abe to cover long enough....culpepper will be scrabling giving his receivers more time to get open. Cincy had no sacks on trent dilfer last week, they had trouble getting to him. Culpepper will have a little more time than he did last week and should have a big game. I say 329 yds, 4 tds 1 int.

**ItalianStallion** · 09-17-2005, 06:08 PM

"lilvikes33" wrote:

see the key is that these corners will not be abe to cover long enough....culpepper will be scrabling giving his receivers more time to get open. Cincy had no sacks on trent dilfer last week, they had trouble getting to him. Culpepper will have a little more time than he did last week and should have a big game. I say 329 yds, 4 tds 1 int.

329? Why no round it off to a cool 330

**BigEasyViking** · 09-17-2005, 06:09 PM

I really don't know much about the Bengals secondary, but I really don't think that any team will be able to stop our O once pepp gets in his rythem! They can't hold him down forever, and it really won't matter who he's throwing to or whose defending them. I also feel that our D can shut down Johnson and Johnson. But good luck Bengals! I hope both teams make it out of the game injury free.

Vikes 35
Bengals 17

Pepp 19-24 for 375 and 5 TD'S

:usa2:

**ultravikingfan** · 09-17-2005, 06:09 PM

"ItalianStallion" wrote:

"lilvikes33" wrote:

see the key is that these corners will not be abe to cover long enough....culpepper will be scrabling giving his receivers more time to get open. Cincy had no sacks on trent dilfer last week, they had trouble getting to him. Culpepper will have a little more time than he did last week and should have a big game. I say 329 yds, 4 tds 1 int.

329? Why no round it off to a cool 330

Or round it off to 400! :razz:

**snowinapril** · 09-17-2005, 06:23 PM

They didn't have any sacks against Clev but Dilfer got hurried on occassion.

If they don't get consistant pressure on DC, DC could get himself back into rhythm this game.

The 329 instead of 330 is a marketing strategy. It is an easier sell to convince us of 329 yds. It is much more attractive than 330. Especially in such times, in this economy. LOL

**michaelmazid** · 09-17-2005, 06:45 PM

"ultravikingfan" wrote:

"ItalianStallion" wrote:

"lilvikes33" wrote:

see the key is that these corners will not be abe to cover long enough....culpepper will be scrabling giving his receivers more time to get open. Cincy had no sacks on trent dilfer last week, they had trouble getting to him. Culpepper will have a little more time than he did last week and should have a big game. I say 329 yds, 4 tds 1 int.

329? Why no round it off to a cool 330

Or round it off to 400! :razz:

why don't we go for a cool 500 yards while we are at it. :lol: