Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: My Take

  1. #11
    briboy75's Avatar
    briboy75 is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    555

    My Take

    "iLUUUVpurple!!!" wrote:
    "404" wrote:
    Also, if the refs just stopped jumping on Favre's penis, then maybe they would not've given them that free time out, therefore, that 4th quater FG would only tie it...
    think about it, a QB needs to know if he has more downs. it was close enough to warrant a measurement. we lost. it sucks. we still have the playoffs though, now look ahead and quit making excuses for a 4th quarter collapse.
    If we make the playoffs... Somehow I can see this getting screwed up, like usual... we aren't going anywere... have you watched this team.. they have just plain out sucked lately. my grandma could pass on this defense. hell, shes probably better then harrington with the flu.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,160

    My Take

    That team that supposedly gives up the 6th amount of points in the NFL gave up 47 to the Eagles. Do you think they have a better offense than us? I would take Culpepper over McNabb, Moss over TO, Burleson over Stinkston, etc all day long. To me that stat is just an excuse. Were they not the same D in the first half? Why did our playcalling turn so conservative after the half? We ran ran ran and then when we had to, we passed. Im tired of excuses, we need answers - and the coaching staff is where the problem is.

    Sig Created by MinnesotaFury

  3. #13
    ultravikingfan's Avatar
    ultravikingfan is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    24,514

    My Take

    Coming into this game the Pack was 20th in the NFL in points allowed. The Viks were 23rd. What is this 6th in the league referring too?

  4. #14
    Storm's Avatar
    Storm is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    492

    My Take

    "404" wrote:
    I also think whoever (likely Tice) chose to punt the ball under 2 min in the 4th quater needs to be fired as well. Packers have a history of last min come backs, do we really have a realistic chance at stopping them from a filed goal? Besides, after that Wiggins catch, I believe we were at 4th and 10 or so, we have a better chance of winning by attempting that then hoping our D can hold Packers to 0 points in 90 sec with 2 TOs.
    Agreed, I was thinking the same thing during the game. Better to take a chance right there than to put the game in the hands of our godawful defense... But no, we give 'em the ball back and watch Favre pick us apart, AGAIN. Sigh...

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,160

    My Take

    someone on the posts above said the Pack was 6th in scoring D. I agree with you Storm about us keeping the ball in our offense. I think Tice didnt want to hurt the D's feelings by showing no faith in them. Its just bad coaching move after another, i am starting to see a pattern. Please give the Vikings a new head coach for Xmas and the new year!!

    Sig Created by MinnesotaFury

  6. #16
    iLUUUVpurple!!! is offline Waterboy
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    12

    My Take

    "ultravikingfan" wrote:
    Coming into this game the Pack was 20th in the NFL in points allowed. The Viks were 23rd. What is this 6th in the league referring too?
    '98 vikings defense.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •