Felton lining up as a receiver and atching a 17 yard pass
Runs that feint up the middle and then bump out to one of the sides
It also isn't run right, run left, occasional pass. The offense IS run heavy, as it should be, but your oversimplification of it is no different that saying the Patriots aren't creative because all they do is pass short, pass long, occasional run.
Yes, we have AD, and that is obviously a huge thing. But just because you have the best player at that position doesn't mean you can't screw it up. The Lions have Megatron, and were second in the league in passing and third in the league in total offense. However they were 17th in scoring and 28th in wins.
I think Musgrave has been doing a very good job with the offense these last four games, averaging nearly 30 points a game. Some of the creative flares may be subtle, but obviously they are working.
Not sure where all the warm and fuzzies for Musgrave are coming from. He's been average at best. There has been improvement the last few games, but there was certainly room for it. Vikings still do not take advantage of play action enough in my estimation. We got by last week despite the offense, not because of it (excepting Peterson of course and the run blocking). The personal foul on GB on the third down stop led to a critical TD. The third down conversion to Simpson was a blown coverage that anybody should have taken advantage of. 50 yard field goals won't be available at Lambeau. We'll need to step it up significantly to win Saturday.
To call plays for run-first Vikings' offense, creativity is important for coordinator Musgrave
Read more: To call plays for run-first Vikings' offense, creativity is important for coordinator Musgrave | Fox News
I said at the beginning of the season that the team will only go as far as the Coaching Staff will take them. I think it was Musgrave who was lost after Harvin went down, not Ponder. lol. Not saying Ponder wasn't stinking up the joint for a bit but he has turned it around after the GB loss. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Musgrave had to have a hand in it. Sometimes Musgrave overdoes it, with the same negative plays called. and some of the "trick" plays fools no one. I guess you'll have that.
SKOL! Go Vikings!
I am not thrilled with Musgrave, but that's primarily due to my being less than thrilled with his boss.
He did the best he could - likely - with what he had. Not sure anyone else would have done any better. Fact is, we need better pieces for him to work with.
It took Musgrave most of the season to figure out Ponder's strengths and weaknesses, then call the plays with the best chance for success.
Musgrave is said to be very bright, therefore it should be no surprise when common sense eludes him.
Common sense dictates handing the ball to Peterson and running Webb with run options, not throwing the ball. Even if he thought Webb might miraculously develop passing accuracy it should have been apparent it wasn't going to happen after the first pass or two.
Common sense says the probabilty of being successful with Webb throwing was far less than with Adrian running.
Webb gets an F for this game. So does Musgrave.