Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 43
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2006

    Re: Minnesota at Chicago

    We need to focus on not letting chicago start to roll, and keeping up with them till the end

  2. #12
    Prophet's Avatar
    Prophet is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Oct 2006

    Re: Minnesota at Chicago

    Grossman was responsible for four turnovers today, we need to keep that trend up.
    This is going to be a great game, no doubt.
    Hopefully Childress has the boys all fired up and ready to go.
    Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain

  3. #13
    PurplePackerEater is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2005

    Re: Minnesota at Chicago

    "VikesFan787" wrote:
    I believe Chicago will pick apart our secendary.

    What do we have to focus on to win?
    Scoring more points.


  4. #14
    viking14 is offline Waterboy
    Join Date
    Oct 2006

    Re: Minnesota at Chicago

    we have a small
    shot. we only lost by 3 to chicago in week 3 but we were playing better than. we did win today but they were no bears. brad has not
    had 2 good games in a row since week 3.
    the bears are a great team. the vikings are a good team.
    I think we when make the playoffs as a wild card

  5. #15
    BadlandsVikings's Avatar
    BadlandsVikings is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006

    Re: Minnesota at Chicago

    We have a chance if Grossman keeps screwing up.
    You can throw int's so long where it catches up to you.

  6. #16
    jargomcfargo's Avatar
    jargomcfargo is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969

    Re: Minnesota at Chicago

    This Vikings team matches up pretty well with the Bears and may just beat them next week.
    The problem is the only teams that beat the Bears play a very physical game. I haven't seen that from this Vikings team.
    Also the Bears have a great special team and we have a poor special team.
    We have poor blocking and poor coverage.
    And though it is blasphemy to say, Longwell kicks line drives that are short on kickoffs. That puts pressure on already poor coverage teams.
    The reason I think the Vikings can beat them is because their QB sucks.
    But if our D line doesn't start rushing even he can beat us.
    A brick wall could be number one against the run; but it doesn't have much effect on the passing game.
    It's time to get pissed and knock some opposing blockers on their backs.
    If Udeze's job is outside containment, he's doing a fine job!
    Neither end is producing. I think there needs to be more rotation to spell these guys or a 3rd down pass rush specialist needs to be utilized more. That's one thing Mike Tice did do well!
    There were some positives in the Arizona game. But the only positive change I see that will carry over to the Chicago game is the right side of the O-line play,Robinson as the primary receiver, and Smoot played better/tried harder.
    I liked the play where Cook put his man on his back.I think that was a third down conversion.
    Oh yeah, one last thought regarding the O-line. Some one has to pick up the blitz.We seem to do it on a part time basis. A delayed blitz always seems to work against us.
    “What takes a quarterback to the next level is not arm strength or mobility or any of that stuff. It’s the ability to play on critical downs. Manage third downs, or red zones or four-minute or two-minute situations"

  7. #17
    CyVikeFan is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Nov 2006

    Re: Minnesota at Chicago

    As I said in another thread, they need to force Grossman into a pressure situation.
    I've seen often that when he's under pressure, he'll throw off his back foot, causing him to loft the ball and give the defender time to get under the ball and possibly make a play.
    Might be a plausible solution.

  8. #18
    ItalianStallion's Avatar
    ItalianStallion is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969

    Re: Minnesota at Chicago

    They key to winning will be our pass defense.
    It goes without saying that we probably won't score many points, and they won't be able to run.
    So if we can get another multiple INT day, we have a good chance.

    I m like a Ja Rule poster, cause I'm off the wall.

  9. #19
    Mr-holland's Avatar
    Mr-holland is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969

    Re: Minnesota at Chicago

    We won't get picked, Grossman is gonne get picked !!!
    seriously grossman played terrible last night in my eyes, which doesn't mean he's gonne play against us that bad but you never know

    also the O finally played a verry good game and if we keep running we can win it
    i'm sure BJ is gonne have a pick but who knows maybe he isn't
    Chester plyed great and that fumble call was bullshit

    anyway think about it
    we're gonne win!!! at leat we have to
    Rosie O'Donnell is a dude!

  10. #20
    Vikes's Avatar
    Vikes is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969

    Re: Minnesota at Chicago

    We just need to play better on the ROAD!

    The rigors of Spartan life. Leonidas is cast out into the wild, and survives the harsh winter to return to his home, when he is crowned King ....a Viking!


Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-06-2009, 02:40 PM
  2. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 03-26-2008, 09:19 AM
  3. Chicago-ese
    By josdin00 in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-29-2007, 03:02 PM
  4. Chicago
    By ChiVike in forum Free Beer!
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-20-2006, 11:07 PM
  5. Chicago
    By ChiVike in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-17-2006, 10:41 PM

Tags for this Thread


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts