Thread: McLeod Bethel Thompson = Ponder
08-26-2013, 07:22 PM #11
08-26-2013, 07:37 PM #12
08-26-2013, 07:58 PM #13Rookie
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Spirit Lake, Iowa
08-26-2013, 08:33 PM #14
If we had lost one more game 2 years ago we would be sitting with Luck or RG3. We also could have traded back a few more and still drafted Tannehill.
Where I fault the FO is they get a QB they think they can groom and then they lock onto them like there is no chance of failure. There is no reason not to bring in multiple players and let them compete to see who rises to the top and they should never stop looking until they have a guy that proves he deserves to be there.
08-27-2013, 05:59 AM #16
McLeod Bethel Thompson = Ponder
Oh yeah. I forgot how all we needed was a LT and that was going to make the whole offense better. In fact I remember someone posting that drafting that LT was actually going to make the defense better. Glad we got all that.
08-27-2013, 07:31 AM #18
08-27-2013, 08:23 AM #19
I'm getting a feeling that no matter if they were good or could be good they would get broken here, its a hang over from the KAO of the Childress era.
08-27-2013, 10:34 AM #20
If McLeod were ready to play QB he would already be in playing. He is not. We threw Ponder in early and look what happened. A QB that lacks confidence. The truth is we are stuck with mediocre QB's until someone is cut from another team that has some years left on them or we draft a really good QB in the future. Ponder is just waiting for someone to come along so he can be a backup or else go the way of TJ. Until this happens we are just a running team that occasionally attempts to pass. Last year we went about as far as we will go in the playoffs until we get a franchise player at QB. That is just the truth of the matter.