Thread: McKinney back !

I am looking forward to Bryant McKinney being back this week. We have missed his blocking. I think that when he gets back, our offense will improve. I think that the off-tackle runs we have been running to the left will be much better when he gets back in at left tackle, too. Pass blocking will improve, and I am also hoping that we get less offensive line flags when he is back. I am really glad he is back.

Our defense is clearly good, and I think that with some improvements to the offense, we can improve as the year goes on.

"StillPurple" wrote:

I am looking forward to Bryant McKinney being back this week. We have missed his blocking. I think that when he gets back, our offense will improve. I think that the off-tackle runs we have been running to the left will be much better when he gets back in at left tackle, too. Pass blocking will improve, and I am also hoping that we get less offensive line flags when he is back. I am really glad he is back.

Our defense is clearly good, and I think that with some improvements to the offense, we can improve as the year goes on.

Hicks did a good job in his absence. I'd cut McKinnie.



Just kidding. I'm glad he is back also. And Hicks did do much better than I expected.

The absence of McKinnie is not the reason we're 1-3.
We have MUCH bigger issues.


Glad to have McKinnie back though

It will be nice to have McKinnie back, I think he's gonna have a nice season, we'll see how he reacts with not having played football for 4 weeks. We certainly don't have to give him the help Artis was getting and I know he doesn't hold near as much, 1 holding flag last season, thats tremendous.

"HEY" wrote:

The absence of McKinnie is not the reason we're 1-3.
We have MUCH bigger issues.


Glad to have McKinnie back though

bigger than McKinnie? You know he's 6-8 350+lbs right? Not to many issues bigger than that.

"jmcdon00" wrote:

"HEY" wrote:

The absence of McKinnie is not the reason we're 1-3.
We have MUCH bigger issues.


Glad to have McKinnie back though

bigger than McKinnie? You know he's 6-8 350+lbs right? Not to many issues bigger than that.

"Fumbling twice in the opposing teams side of the field" Is that a big enough issue?

"VikingsTw" wrote:

"jmcdon00" wrote:

"HEY" wrote:

The absence of McKinnie is not the reason we're 1-3.
We have MUCH bigger issues.


Glad to have McKinnie back though

bigger than McKinnie? You know he's 6-8 350+lbs right? Not to many issues bigger than that.

"Fumbling twice in the opposing teams side of the field" Is that a big enough issue?

nope thats football man. I said before the game that who ever have the most turnovers will lose this game and we have 3 crucial ones. so the titans got lucky that game, I still think we will make the playoffs this year if our team dont start to lose faith in it.

"HEY" wrote:

The absence of McKinnie is not the reason we're 1-3.
We have MUCH bigger issues.


Glad to have McKinnie back though

+1

"duvaldomo" wrote:

"VikingsTw" wrote:

"jmcdon00" wrote:

"HEY" wrote:

The absence of McKinnie is not the reason we're 1-3.
We have MUCH bigger issues.


Glad to have McKinnie back though

bigger than McKinnie? You know he's 6-8 350+lbs right? Not to many issues bigger than that.

"Fumbling twice in the opposing teams side of the field" Is that a big enough issue?

nope thats football man. I said before the game that who ever have the most turnovers will lose this game and we have 3 crucial ones. so the titans got lucky that game, I still think we will make the playoffs this year if our team dont start to lose faith in it.

I agree they got really lucky, aside from our own self destruction the Refs handed them 7 points that made the differnece in the remaining game.

I'm glad to have him back....kind of like when I'm glad to see some long lost uncle pervy at a family reunion, it's interesting seeing him show up and watch people react...but I don't want anything to do with him.