Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34
  1. #11
    BadlandsVikings's Avatar
    BadlandsVikings is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    26,564

    Re: Maybe a stud TE?

    Why waste money on a new one when were paying 2 to do nothing.

  2. #12
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Re: Maybe a stud TE?

    We don't need no stinkin' tight end...Wiggy and Kleinsasser are plenty good enough!

    What we do need is for at least ONE of our WRs to start taking over games...otherwise we need to find someone who will.
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

  3. #13
    whackthepack is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,535

    Re: Maybe a stud TE?

    Kleinsasser needs to take a pay cut because he is not worth the 3 million a year we are paying him!
    If he does catch a ball he falls down without being touched or with the first hit, for a guy his size he goes down way to easy.
    What we've got here is failure to communicate.

  4. #14
    Billy Boy is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,426

    Re: Maybe a stud TE?

    How bout more passes T Richs way...hes had 3 receptions for 38 yards so far.


    All the kids my age pee their pants, it's the coolest.

  5. #15
    stateVIKE44's Avatar
    stateVIKE44 is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    342

    Re: Maybe a stud TE?

    Just yesterday I was thinking that exact same thing about the Tight End. I'm not saying the Vikes would need to get rid of Wiggins or Sass. But, if the Vikes could find a young tight end that had the speed to stretch the field, the hands to demand some attention, and DECENT blocking ability so that you could trust him in there on passing downs where he doesn't have a route, I think they should go for it. A speedy, pass catching tight end can be great asset to any team.
    "I play for the love of the game; I play because there is no greater feeling than hearing 80,000 fans screaming when you smack somebody!"
    ~ Jared Allen

  6. #16
    Ltrey33 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,618

    Re: Maybe a stud TE?

    Is that you Napo? Be honest....

  7. #17
    snowinapril's Avatar
    snowinapril is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    13,404

    Re: Maybe a stud TE?

    "stateVIKE44" wrote:
    Just yesterday I was thinking that exact same thing about the Tight End. I'm not saying the Vikes would need to get rid of Wiggins or Sass. But, if the Vikes could find a young tight end that had the speed to stretch the field, the hands to demand some attention, and DECENT blocking ability so that you could trust him in there on passing downs where he doesn't have a route, I think they should go for it. A speedy, pass catching tight end can be great asset to any team.
    I like Sass, but I think that he is nearing his end here in the BC era.
    His only saving grace is if they see him replacing T-Rich.
    I think his health may have scared the BC administration a bit, so the got T-Rich.
    I like both Wiggins and Sass, don't want to see either of them go.
    It would be nice to have a guy that would have the best of both Wiggins and Sass.
    JMHO.

  8. #18
    ejmat is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,849

    Re: Maybe a stud TE?

    Can I ask everyone what is wrong with the offense?
    The offense is fine.
    They move the ball fine.
    It's the lack of getting in the endzone.
    Our TEs we have are perfect for this offense.
    What is needed is a WR that catches the ball as a professional should.
    Everyone's so worried about BJs stats.
    Why don't you factor in the dropped deep passes and the penalties that caused them to lose big plays?
    If people would catch the ball effectively BJs stats would be top 10 in the league right now so please get off his back.
    Not only that but factor the defenses we've played thus far.
    Wash, Car, Chi, and Buf (15th, 22th, 4th, 12th respectively).
    Carolina may be 22nd in the league right now but we all know they are much better than that ranking.
    The reason why Chicago is 4th and not first is because they played the Vikings.

    All we need to odo is start designing more plays in the endzone when we get there and everybody will get off this trip.
    I do agree a more proven WR (Porter) would be great.
    But all in all the offense is fine.

  9. #19
    Ltrey33 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,618

    Re: Maybe a stud TE?

    "tb04512" wrote:
    A STUD TE????? WE HAVE ONE WIGGY IS AMAZING JIM K IS HUGE, AND CAN BLOCK LIKE NONE OTHER(MET HIM A FEW TIMES, I SOLD HIM MADDEN ONCE, HAHA) AND IDC IF WIGGY WAS A SCRUB I COULD WATCH THAT GUY HURDLE OVER PEOPLE ALL DAY! JUS GET HIM THE BALL MORE IN THE FLAT
    PP.O rule 13.
    NO POSTING IN ALL CAPS.

    Have a nice day!
    ;D

  10. #20
    Eyedea's Avatar
    Eyedea is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    430

    Re: Maybe a stud TE?

    "ejmat" wrote:
    Can I ask everyone what is wrong with the offense?
    The offense is fine.
    They move the ball fine.
    It's the lack of getting in the endzone.
    Our TEs we have are perfect for this offense.
    What is needed is a WR that catches the ball as a professional should.
    Everyone's so worried about BJs stats.
    Why don't you factor in the dropped deep passes and the penalties that caused them to lose big plays?
    If people would catch the ball effectively BJs stats would be top 10 in the league right now so please get off his back.
    Not only that but factor the defenses we've played thus far.
    Wash, Car, Chi, and Buf (15th, 22th, 4th, 12th respectively).
    Carolina may be 22nd in the league right now but we all know they are much better than that ranking.
    The reason why Chicago is 4th and not first is because they played the Vikings.

    All we need to odo is start designing more plays in the endzone when we get there and everybody will get off this trip.
    I do agree a more proven WR (Porter) would be great.
    But all in all the offense is fine.
    The defensive rankings didn't help your arguement at all.
    Why even mention them, if you agree they are not correct/true?

    Make love to the present, fuck the past
    --Sage Francis

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Offense better with no stud WR?
    By Garland Greene in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 09-05-2006, 02:40 PM
  2. Look at This 5-STAR STUD MLB in the Draft . . .
    By sleepagent in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 03-27-2006, 07:57 AM
  3. Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!
    By cajunvike in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 03-26-2006, 04:17 PM
  4. Hey,our new punter is a stud!!
    By Paulbedy59 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 09-29-2005, 12:42 PM
  5. Vikings sign STUD rb...
    By Phlegm in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-24-2005, 10:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •