Thread: Maybe a stud TE?
-
10-06-2006, 09:34 AM #11
Re: Maybe a stud TE?
Why waste money on a new one when were paying 2 to do nothing.

-
10-06-2006, 09:40 AM #12
Re: Maybe a stud TE?
We don't need no stinkin' tight end...Wiggy and Kleinsasser are plenty good enough!
What we do need is for at least ONE of our WRs to start taking over games...otherwise we need to find someone who will.BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
-
10-06-2006, 09:54 AM #13
Jersey Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 6,535
Re: Maybe a stud TE?
Kleinsasser needs to take a pay cut because he is not worth the 3 million a year we are paying him!
If he does catch a ball he falls down without being touched or with the first hit, for a guy his size he goes down way to easy.What we've got here is failure to communicate.
-
10-06-2006, 10:29 AM #14
Re: Maybe a stud TE?
How bout more passes T Richs way...hes had 3 receptions for 38 yards so far.

All the kids my age pee their pants, it's the coolest.
-
10-06-2006, 11:04 AM #15
Re: Maybe a stud TE?
Just yesterday I was thinking that exact same thing about the Tight End. I'm not saying the Vikes would need to get rid of Wiggins or Sass. But, if the Vikes could find a young tight end that had the speed to stretch the field, the hands to demand some attention, and DECENT blocking ability so that you could trust him in there on passing downs where he doesn't have a route, I think they should go for it. A speedy, pass catching tight end can be great asset to any team.
"I play for the love of the game; I play because there is no greater feeling than hearing 80,000 fans screaming when you smack somebody!"
~ Jared Allen
-
10-06-2006, 12:04 PM #16
Re: Maybe a stud TE?
Is that you Napo? Be honest....
-
10-06-2006, 12:12 PM #17
Re: Maybe a stud TE?
"stateVIKE44" wrote:
I like Sass, but I think that he is nearing his end here in the BC era.Just yesterday I was thinking that exact same thing about the Tight End. I'm not saying the Vikes would need to get rid of Wiggins or Sass. But, if the Vikes could find a young tight end that had the speed to stretch the field, the hands to demand some attention, and DECENT blocking ability so that you could trust him in there on passing downs where he doesn't have a route, I think they should go for it. A speedy, pass catching tight end can be great asset to any team.
His only saving grace is if they see him replacing T-Rich.
I think his health may have scared the BC administration a bit, so the got T-Rich.
I like both Wiggins and Sass, don't want to see either of them go.
It would be nice to have a guy that would have the best of both Wiggins and Sass.
JMHO.
-
10-06-2006, 12:12 PM #18
Jersey Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 8,849
Re: Maybe a stud TE?
Can I ask everyone what is wrong with the offense?
The offense is fine.
They move the ball fine.
It's the lack of getting in the endzone.
Our TEs we have are perfect for this offense.
What is needed is a WR that catches the ball as a professional should.
Everyone's so worried about BJs stats.
Why don't you factor in the dropped deep passes and the penalties that caused them to lose big plays?
If people would catch the ball effectively BJs stats would be top 10 in the league right now so please get off his back.
Not only that but factor the defenses we've played thus far.
Wash, Car, Chi, and Buf (15th, 22th, 4th, 12th respectively).
Carolina may be 22nd in the league right now but we all know they are much better than that ranking.
The reason why Chicago is 4th and not first is because they played the Vikings.
All we need to odo is start designing more plays in the endzone when we get there and everybody will get off this trip.
I do agree a more proven WR (Porter) would be great.
But all in all the offense is fine.
-
10-06-2006, 12:13 PM #19
Re: Maybe a stud TE?
"tb04512" wrote:
PP.O rule 13.A STUD TE????? WE HAVE ONE WIGGY IS AMAZING JIM K IS HUGE, AND CAN BLOCK LIKE NONE OTHER(MET HIM A FEW TIMES, I SOLD HIM MADDEN ONCE, HAHA) AND IDC IF WIGGY WAS A SCRUB I COULD WATCH THAT GUY HURDLE OVER PEOPLE ALL DAY! JUS GET HIM THE BALL MORE IN THE FLAT
NO POSTING IN ALL CAPS.
Have a nice day!
;D
-
10-06-2006, 12:27 PM #20
Re: Maybe a stud TE?
"ejmat" wrote:
The defensive rankings didn't help your arguement at all.Can I ask everyone what is wrong with the offense?
The offense is fine.
They move the ball fine.
It's the lack of getting in the endzone.
Our TEs we have are perfect for this offense.
What is needed is a WR that catches the ball as a professional should.
Everyone's so worried about BJs stats.
Why don't you factor in the dropped deep passes and the penalties that caused them to lose big plays?
If people would catch the ball effectively BJs stats would be top 10 in the league right now so please get off his back.
Not only that but factor the defenses we've played thus far.
Wash, Car, Chi, and Buf (15th, 22th, 4th, 12th respectively).
Carolina may be 22nd in the league right now but we all know they are much better than that ranking.
The reason why Chicago is 4th and not first is because they played the Vikings.
All we need to odo is start designing more plays in the endzone when we get there and everybody will get off this trip.
I do agree a more proven WR (Porter) would be great.
But all in all the offense is fine.
Why even mention them, if you agree they are not correct/true?
Make love to the present, fuck the past
--Sage Francis
Similar Threads
-
Offense better with no stud WR?
By Garland Greene in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 41Last Post: 09-05-2006, 02:40 PM -
Look at This 5-STAR STUD MLB in the Draft . . .
By sleepagent in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 34Last Post: 03-27-2006, 07:57 AM -
Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!
By cajunvike in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 30Last Post: 03-26-2006, 04:17 PM -
Hey,our new punter is a stud!!
By Paulbedy59 in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 29Last Post: 09-29-2005, 12:42 PM -
Vikings sign STUD rb...
By Phlegm in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 5Last Post: 07-24-2005, 10:54 PM


Reply With Quote






Bookmarks