Thread: Loadholt playing RT in OTAs.

"jessejames09" wrote:

"Garland" wrote:

"Purple_Jesus" wrote:

What the hell?

Why isn't Herrera at guard?

Probbly 2 reasons they want to see what Herrera can do at Center, since it said he can play the position, and the fact that a Center moving to Guard and not center moving to tackle is a much easier transition.

Hmmmm

McKinnie
Hutch
Herrara
Hicks
Load

I could live with that... I think I like it better than what we all assumed.

Mckinnie
Hutch
Sully
Herrera
Load

Herrera isn't participating in OTAs.
That is why he isn't at RG.
I highly doubt that he would move to center.

"NodakPaul" wrote:

"jessejames09" wrote:

"Garland" wrote:

"Purple_Jesus" wrote:

What the hell?

Why isn't Herrera at guard?

Probbly 2 reasons they want to see what Herrera can do at Center, since it said he can play the position, and the fact that a Center moving to Guard and not center moving to tackle is a much easier transition.

Hmmmm

McKinnie
Hutch
Herrara
Hicks
Load

I could live with that... I think I like it better than what we all assumed.

Mckinnie
Hutch
Sully
Herrera
Load

Herrera isn't participating in OTAs.
That is why he isn't at RG.
I highly doubt that he would move to center.

Same here.
He would only move there in the case of an emergency.

"NodakPaul" wrote:

"jessejames09" wrote:

"Garland" wrote:

"Purple_Jesus" wrote:

What the hell?

Why isn't Herrera at guard?

Probbly 2 reasons they want to see what Herrera can do at Center, since it said he can play the position, and the fact that a Center moving to Guard and not center moving to tackle is a much easier transition.

Hmmmm

McKinnie
Hutch
Herrara
Hicks
Load

I could live with that... I think I like it better than what we all assumed.

Mckinnie
Hutch
Sully
Herrera
Load

Herrera isn't participating in OTAs.
That is why he isn't at RG.
I highly doubt that he would move to center.

Oh, I assumed from what was being said he was seeing time at centre. Although I think at some point he will. I also think he first line I posted would be a good option if Sully doesn't pan out.

I agree about the move being doubtful though, I don't know if you should waste a promising young guard by moving him to centre.

"jessejames09" wrote:

"Garland" wrote:

"Purple_Jesus" wrote:

What the hell?

Why isn't Herrera at guard?

Probbly 2 reasons they want to see what Herrera can do at Center, since it said he can play the position, and the fact that a Center moving to Guard and not center moving to tackle is a much easier transition.

Hmmmm

McKinnie
Hutch
Herrara
Hicks
Load

I could live with that... I think I like it better than what we all assumed.

Mckinnie
Hutch
Sully
Herrera
Load

You want 3 guys in new positions including 1 rookie on our O Line?
You do realize there's only 5 guys on the O Line right?
That's 60% change...
ummm...
Why mess with what works?
Herrera has been solid at RG, leave well enough alone... Cook and Sully compete for C, Hicks and Load compete for RT.
Theoretically, if the veterans beat the youngsters, we could be starting 5 guys who all started for us last year.

"BleedinPandG" wrote:

"jessejames09" wrote:

"Garland" wrote:

"Purple_Jesus" wrote:

What the hell?

Why isn't Herrera at guard?

Probbly 2 reasons they want to see what Herrera can do at Center, since it said he can play the position, and the fact that a Center moving to Guard and not center moving to tackle is a much easier transition.

Hmmmm

McKinnie
Hutch
Herrara
Hicks
Load

I could live with that... I think I like it better than what we all assumed.

Mckinnie
Hutch
Sully
Herrera
Load

You want 3 guys in new positions including 1 rookie on our O Line?
You do realize there's only 5 guys on the O Line right?
That's 60% change...
ummm...
Why mess with what works?
Herrera has been solid at RG, leave well enough alone... Cook and Sully compete for C, Hicks and Load compete for RT.
Theoretically, if the veterans beat the youngsters, we could be starting 5 guys who all started for us last year.

When do we trade for Birk?

I don't want 3 new starters, I assume we're going to have 2 though, and one more really wouldn't bother me. Our O-line is less than stellar in pass protection, there is always room for improvement.

We didn't draft Loadholt to sit on the bench, and Sully is leading the race for the starting role a centre. That's a 40% turnover regardless!