Re: The lesser of two evils.
I've got nobody comparing the two qb's and 2 people voting for TJ-I put that up as a joke like the other two options under it.WTF?
Re: The lesser of two evils.
I didn't vote because it was confusing to me.
It all depends on the time-scale you're talking about and the rest of the team and salary cap issues...etc.
I know, over analyzing the situation.
It's probably just the way it's asked.
Re: The lesser of two evils.
But which QB would you rather have starting Johnson or Grossman?
Re: The lesser of two evils.
For the Vikings I would rather have BJ.
Why?
He's an interim solution while TJ is being groomed.
The thought of having Grossman as the future of Vikings football makes my skin crawl.
Re: The lesser of two evils.
But for this Sun-who would it be?
Re: The lesser of two evils.
If they both had been on our team from the start of this season, I'd probably have started Grossman and tried to teach him as a new QB to our system if I were Chilldres.
But it's a highly hypothetical question, so I found it hard to decide upon it.
Re: The lesser of two evils.
I had to vote for TJack because I don't like any of the other QBs in the poll. I used to like Pep until he turned his back on us. Rex & BJ aka: cement shoes aka: noodle arm. Are just not my favorite.
Re: The lesser of two evils.
I know, I keep realizing that as I try to get answers. I dunno, Grossman seems like a QB who wouldn't be able to beat anybody when it's up to the QB's to win the game, yet if there is no pressure could throw for 400yds.
Re: The lesser of two evils.
If you want better answers, ask better questions.
I'm not trying to be a jerk, but if you ask ambiguous questions expect ambiguous answers.