Thread: Leftwich
-
09-16-2007, 10:05 PM #21
Re: Leftwich
"Articnv" wrote:
I've seen you lurking around in the wee hours Articnv.with the way the line played today no one woudl look good as a qb.
the game is
won in the trenches and the
o ling lost it
Glad to see you come out of the woodwork. It's been too long.
"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
-
09-16-2007, 10:12 PM #22
Re: Leftwich
I wouldn't be against the idea of bringing in Leftwich and seeing what he could do. Our line play was horrible today, but a vet QB would have ate the ball and taken the sack instead of chucking it up. When we have the type of defense that we do, all the offense has to do is not turn the ball over and that's what we did today.

Thanks Josdin
-
09-17-2007, 09:59 PM #23
The Official: Byron Leftwich Thread
So since T-Jack is out for awhile.
Should the Vikings go out and sign Leftwich?
He is the best QB available and I don't have a lot of faith in any of our other options.

-
09-17-2007, 10:01 PM #24
Re: Byron Leftwich Thread
I think that we should sign Chris Leak...I hear that he's available.
BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
-
09-17-2007, 10:02 PM #25
Re: Byron Leftwich Thread
"cajunvike" wrote:
Chris Leak is in Chicago still, isn't he?I think that we should sign Chris Leak...I hear that he's available.
-
09-17-2007, 10:03 PM #26
Re: Byron Leftwich Thread
"PurpleGator" wrote:
Yes, he is available."cajunvike" wrote:
Chris Leak is in Chicago still, isn't he?I think that we should sign Chris Leak...I hear that he's available.
I just read he was cut by the Bears so they could keep Kyle Orton.

-
09-17-2007, 10:04 PM #27
Re: Byron Leftwich Thread
"PurpleGator" wrote:
So since T-Jack is out for awhile.
Should the Vikings go out and sign Leftwich?
He is the best QB available and I don't have a lot of faith in any of our other options.

-
09-17-2007, 10:04 PM #28
Re: Byron Leftwich Thread
"PurpleGator" wrote:
No he was cut. We should not sign Chris Leak he will never be a legit NFL QB and is a waste of a roster spot. Leftwich however is worth a pickup. He is for sure better then Brooks Bollinger so why not sign him?"cajunvike" wrote:
Chris Leak is in Chicago still, isn't he?I think that we should sign Chris Leak...I hear that he's available.
-
09-17-2007, 10:06 PM #29
Re: Byron Leftwich Thread
"PurpleGator" wrote:
So since T-Jack is out for awhile.
Should the Vikings go out and sign Leftwich?
He is the best QB available and I don't have a lot of faith in any of our other options.
As we speak he might be signing with the Falcons.......
http://www.purplepride.org/forums/index.php?topic=37964.0
Besides there already is a Leftwich thread
http://www.purplepride.org/forums/index.php?topic=37918.0
Did you even do a search?

"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
-
09-17-2007, 10:08 PM #30
Re: Byron Leftwich Thread
"PurpleGator" wrote:
Nope...Griese and Orton are the backups."cajunvike" wrote:
Chris Leak is in Chicago still, isn't he?I think that we should sign Chris Leak...I hear that he's available.BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
Similar Threads
-
Leftwich on Bears: 'Tell them to look me up'
By singersp in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 31Last Post: 01-14-2009, 07:48 PM -
Does Leftwich Interest Anyone?
By MaxVike in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 79Last Post: 10-17-2007, 09:08 PM -
Leftwich in Falcons' sights
By singersp in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 7Last Post: 09-18-2007, 03:19 PM -
Week 9: Brees vs Leftwich
By gregair13 in forum Fantasy Football TalkReplies: 0Last Post: 11-01-2005, 04:50 PM -
leftwich to start?
By TheAnimal93 in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 13Last Post: 11-25-2004, 08:51 AM




Reply With Quote






Bookmarks