Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 34 of 34
  1. #31
    magicci's Avatar
    magicci is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    oxnard, ca
    Posts
    5,440

    Re: Kleinsasser as FB

    "Marrdro" wrote:
    "V" wrote:
    I would much rather see this set over anything previously proposed in this thread:

    Berrian














    LT LG C RG RT















    Rice















    Shank



    QB



    Sauce


























    AD

    I love that formation.

    So many things can be done out of it and I bet we see alot of it next year.
    Nothing like power football my friends.
    It might be boring to most, but I love it and it breaks a the other team down when you impose your will on them out of a formation like this.
    This is the formation we mainly ran before childress was the coach. Tice and Green didnt really use a fullback that much in the offense. and i think thats when jimmy k was used more as a fb because he was a tweener.

  2. #32
    V-Unit's Avatar
    V-Unit is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,317

    Re: Kleinsasser as FB

    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    I like this one for short "running downs"














    Mills LT LG C RG RT Shank
    Berrian















    TJ






















    CT





















    AD

    Imagine running counter dives or play action to the tight ends/RB's out of this formation
    Some things I see wrong with this.

    First of all. We aren't going to gain yards out of it because Taylor is a decoy, not a blocker. Using him there instead of the bulkier Tapeh (God I wish it was Richardson) would be foolish. The FB in this situation is mroe likely to get the tough yards without a lead blocker, and also more likely to provide a better lead blocker for AD. I'm also assuming Sauce is a better blocker than both Shank and Mills, so why take him off the field in short yardage?

    Two, who runs counter dives or playaction on short running situations? I would puke if I saw us try to run stuff like that when we are good enough to put our heads down and get the yards.

    This formation relies on pure trickery to get short yards. You don't need trickery to get short yards.
    "I hate when threads are destroyed by facts and logic."
    - Prophet


    Thanks Josdin!

  3. #33
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,271

    Re: Kleinsasser as FB

    "V" wrote:
    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    I like this one for short "running downs"













    Mills LT LG C RG RT Shank
    Berrian














    TJ





















    CT




















    AD

    Imagine running counter dives or play action to the tight ends/RB's out of this formation
    Some things I see wrong with this.

    First of all. We aren't going to gain yards out of it because Taylor is a decoy, not a blocker. Using him there instead of the bulkier Tapeh (God I wish it was Richardson) would be foolish. The FB in this situation is mroe likely to get the tough yards without a lead blocker, and also more likely to provide a better lead blocker for AD. I'm also assuming Sauce is a better blocker than both Shank and Mills, so why take him off the field in short yardage?

    Two, who runs counter dives or playaction on short running situations? I would puke if I saw us try to run stuff like that when we are good enough to put our heads down and get the yards.

    This formation relies on pure trickery to get short yards. You don't need trickery to get short yards.
    Ah, but as we saw the past two years, trickery will get you TD's.

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  4. #34
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Kleinsasser as FB

    "seaniemck7" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    "V" wrote:
    I would much rather see this set over anything previously proposed in this thread:

    Berrian













    LT LG C RG RT















    Rice















    Shank



    QB



    Sauce

























    AD

    I love that formation.

    So many things can be done out of it and I bet we see alot of it next year.
    Nothing like power football my friends.
    It might be boring to most, but I love it and it breaks a the other team down when you impose your will on them out of a formation like this.
    That is a formation that we could potentially be very successful with.
    That would give me nightmares if I was a D cord.
    Do I play run, pass?

    Imagine how confused they would get if they put someone in motion or the QB rolled out or heaven forbid the QB ran out of this after a playaction to AD.

    Scary when you sit there and think of the different things you could do out of it.
    At least this formation is legal vice some of the ones proposed earlier like the "12th man" formation or the "not enough guys on the line of scrimmage formation"
    :P
    It's the offseason, have a little fun ;D

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Similar Threads

  1. Jim Kleinsasser
    By acman1 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 09-17-2008, 02:51 AM
  2. Kleinsasser can fly..
    By skum in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-05-2008, 08:37 PM
  3. Is Kleinsasser out?
    By kyleo1967 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-06-2007, 02:26 PM
  4. Kleinsasser
    By josdin00 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-08-2005, 08:54 PM
  5. Kleinsasser
    By hawaiianvike21 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-11-2003, 02:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •