10-22-2013, 02:22 PM #1
Just one non-QB thread to discuss AD
Let's forget the QB situation for just a sec, and talk about WHY on earth we are more willing to try to throw the ball than to just do some 3 and outs revolving around Peterson.
Anyone have any theories as to WHY he doesn't get the ball 40 times a game? The whole "We couldn't get our run game working.." doesn't cut it with me. There is a conscious effort to win the games we are playing through the air, and I just don't get it.
I can't even come up with a weird conspiracy theory for it, besides someone wants to make Frazier look bad.Men are moved by two levers only: fear and self interest.
~Napoleon Bonaparte on Politics
10-22-2013, 02:37 PM #2Trying out some new forums since I got my ip banned on Purple Chat 2 weeks ago...
10-22-2013, 03:21 PM #3
Last year we didn't try to pretend that we could throw the ball so we focused on running it and regardless of the 8-9 men in the box we were able to counter it and have a pretty productive running offense.
Since then we have been striving to get better at passing the ball and the more we fail the more we fail at both aspects. If you want to get the running game going this year, with the mess we have created, then your going to need to find a QB that can complete some passes. As easy as it was to game plan against us last year, it is much easier this year. I think most teams spend about 10 minutes briefing their players on the gameplan against the Vikings and then spend the rest of their practices preparing for the opponent after MN.
10-22-2013, 04:53 PM #4
With any other back, I could understand...but doesn't AP deserve at least a single game to see if he can bust our offense out of its rut?Men are moved by two levers only: fear and self interest.
~Napoleon Bonaparte on Politics
10-22-2013, 04:57 PM #5
I think that the idiot OC calling every friggin play right up the gut may be a part of the problem. Then, when AP gets stuffed because he's facing 9-10 in the box Musgrave immediately goes to the pass - despite not actually having a PASSING GAME TO GO TO.
Bottom line, Musgrave is an idiot...that;s why AP isn't sparking big.
10-22-2013, 06:35 PM #6Coordinator
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
10-23-2013, 12:52 AM #7
If the ends maintain the edges, and blitzers shoot the gaps or overload, Peterson doesn't have a place to go. If AP goes out, defenders pressure the QB.
Musgrave has done little to attack that defensive style, and the Vikings have not had a quarterback accurate enough and quick enough getting the ball out to exploit the defensive rush.
Peterson is a great runner, but he is not superhuman. He is also not very good at blocking or catching the football.
10-23-2013, 04:39 AM #8
It gets old watching AD hit the line & tip over while other RB's out there are powering thru defenders for at least some yardage. AD has got to be at or near the top for most times tackled for a loss.
If your RB is repeatedly only gaining 2 yards a carry & getting shut down, why would you continue to try and whip a dead horse?
I don't like Musgrave, but I hardly blame him for trying to pass when pounding the ball obviously wasn't working.
Last edited by singersp; 10-23-2013 at 04:45 AM.
"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"