Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 83
  1. #11
    spikecyrus's Avatar
    spikecyrus is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    105

    Re: Johnson will start again for now - Childress' patience wearing thin

    somehow the zebras missed MeMo being tackled while the ball was thrown. the zebras missed alot of calls.

  2. #12
    Desertvikingfan's Avatar
    Desertvikingfan is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    395

    Re: Johnson will start again for now - Childress' patience wearing thin


    The Vikings coach is standing behind his quarterback but has a low tolerance for turnovers.

    Kevin Seifert, Star Tribune
    Last update: October 31, 2006 – 8:24 PM
    I think it would be good to see Childress call out the O line. Besides the Seattle game they haven't played that well, and the protection for Johnson was definitely subpar Monday Night. Aside from the money, these are supposed to be elite players and they flat out got beat by the Pats.

  3. #13
    ItalianStallion's Avatar
    ItalianStallion is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,615

    Re: Johnson will start again for now - Childress' patience wearing thin

    "Del" wrote:
    Hopefully someone worth a gol 'darnit will step up so our granpa QB doesn't have to. Someone needs to make the big play, a WR a RB a TE......someone needs to break away from the moild
    Heaven forbid our qb actually step up and make plays himself, not that it wouldn't be nice seeing someone else do it too.


    I m like a Ja Rule poster, cause I'm off the wall.

  4. #14
    Del Rio Guest

    Re: Johnson will start again for now - Childress' patience wearing thin

    "ItalianStallion" wrote:
    "Del" wrote:
    Hopefully someone worth a gol 'darnit will step up so our granpa QB doesn't have to. Someone needs to make the big play, a WR a RB a TE......someone needs to break away from the moild
    Heaven forbid our qb actually step up and make plays himself, not that it wouldn't be nice seeing someone else do it too.
    He's not a playmaker in the sense you're going to see him scramble for 30 yards or evade 4 sacks and launch a laser off his back foot. He is what he is and when he tries to do some of those things he stinks it up.

    Heaven forbid your WR actually catches a30+ yard perfectly thrown ball. Everyone knows what you get in Johnson. He isn't going to take a game over, but he needs someone who can. It won him a superbowl. It has won many teams superbowls.

    There is absolutley nothing wrong with that. Darren Sharper has better hands then our WR's.

    Brad Johnson isn't going to be breaking the mold he is the mold. He is incredibly non-flashy and has been the same his entire career. We have a lot of young talent on the team that has yet to make a name for themselves. Guys who were first round picks who have bounced around here or there, who have done NOTHING. One of these guys needs to either live up to their "potential" or find someone who can.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    915

    Re: Johnson will start again for now - Childress' patience wearing thin

    "cajunvike" wrote:
    First INT was NOT really his fault...Mewelde was held and there was no call.

    Second INT was thrown into open space and the DB made a great scoop off of the carpet.

    Third INT was the lone pass that was really stupid...and by then the refs had already decided the game's outcome.

    That said, Brad won't have another game like this one again this year.
    Oh come on!!! he over threw MM, it was his fault.
    You cant complain about the officials on that one.
    He over threw it by 5 yards.
    He made dumb choices.
    Be a smart fan, dont blame the refs.
    You republican whore!

  6. #16
    Del Rio Guest

    Re: Johnson will start again for now - Childress' patience wearing thin

    "PurpleRide" wrote:
    "cajunvike" wrote:
    First INT was NOT really his fault...Mewelde was held and there was no call.

    Second INT was thrown into open space and the DB made a great scoop off of the carpet.

    Third INT was the lone pass that was really stupid...and by then the refs had already decided the game's outcome.

    That said, Brad won't have another game like this one again this year.
    Oh come on!!! he over threw MM, it was his fault.
    You cant complain about the officials on that one.
    He over threw it by 5 yards.
    He made dumb choices.
    Be a smart fan, dont blame the refs.
    That was an obvious hold by the LB. No pooh he over threw him LMAO because he wasn't where he was supposed to be because Bruschi was holding him. It's right there plain as day. He played a bad game no doubt made some horrible decisions but I agree with Cajun on that one.

  7. #17
    Del Rio Guest

    Re: Johnson will start again for now - Childress' patience wearing thin

    Besides how can the President of the Brad Johnson fan club be upset with Brad? That is what your title says you are.

  8. #18
    Prophet's Avatar
    Prophet is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    17,388

    Re: Johnson will start again for now - Childress' patience wearing thin

    "Del" wrote:
    "PurpleRide" wrote:
    "cajunvike" wrote:
    First INT was NOT really his fault...Mewelde was held and there was no call.

    Second INT was thrown into open space and the DB made a great scoop off of the carpet.

    Third INT was the lone pass that was really stupid...and by then the refs had already decided the game's outcome.

    That said, Brad won't have another game like this one again this year.
    Oh come on!!! he over threw MM, it was his fault.
    You cant complain about the officials on that one.
    He over threw it by 5 yards.
    He made dumb choices.
    Be a smart fan, dont blame the refs.
    That was an obvious hold by the LB. No pooh he over threw him LMAO because he wasn't where he was supposed to be because Bruschi was holding him. It's right there plain as day. He played a bad game no doubt made some horrible decisions but I agree with Cajun on that one.
    You would think that the president of the BJ fan club would defend him on that play.
    That will have to be discussed at the next meeting.
    Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain

  9. #19
    Gift's Avatar
    Gift is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    811

    Re: Johnson will start again for now - Childress' patience wearing thin

    "Del" wrote:
    "PurpleRide" wrote:
    "cajunvike" wrote:
    First INT was NOT really his fault...Mewelde was held and there was no call.

    Second INT was thrown into open space and the DB made a great scoop off of the carpet.

    Third INT was the lone pass that was really stupid...and by then the refs had already decided the game's outcome.

    That said, Brad won't have another game like this one again this year.
    Oh come on!!! he over threw MM, it was his fault.
    You cant complain about the officials on that one.
    He over threw it by 5 yards.
    He made dumb choices.
    Be a smart fan, dont blame the refs.
    That was an obvious hold by the LB. No pooh he over threw him LMAO because he wasn't where he was supposed to be because Bruschi was holding him. It's right there plain as day. He played a bad game no doubt made some horrible decisions but I agree with Cajun on that one.
    It was still a bad pass.
    When the running back is going up the middle before breaking to his route you can't rely on timing, too many variables once you hit the line.
    A QB like johnson should know this.
    Hold or no hold, it was a bad pass to make in the redzone.
    http://www.purplepride.org/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=6169&dateline=1318052  159

  10. #20
    Del Rio Guest

    Re: Johnson will start again for now - Childress' patience wearing thin

    "Gift" wrote:
    "Del" wrote:
    "PurpleRide" wrote:
    "cajunvike" wrote:
    First INT was NOT really his fault...Mewelde was held and there was no call.

    Second INT was thrown into open space and the DB made a great scoop off of the carpet.

    Third INT was the lone pass that was really stupid...and by then the refs had already decided the game's outcome.

    That said, Brad won't have another game like this one again this year.
    Oh come on!!! he over threw MM, it was his fault.
    You cant complain about the officials on that one.
    He over threw it by 5 yards.
    He made dumb choices.
    Be a smart fan, dont blame the refs.
    That was an obvious hold by the LB. No pooh he over threw him LMAO because he wasn't where he was supposed to be because Bruschi was holding him. It's right there plain as day. He played a bad game no doubt made some horrible decisions but I agree with Cajun on that one.
    It was still a bad pass.
    When the running back is going up the middle before breaking to his route you can't rely on timing, too many variables once you hit the line.
    A QB like johnson should know this.
    Hold or no hold, it was a bad pass to make in the redzone.
    What do you mean you can't rely on timing? He was in his route and the hold didnt even take place until the ball was in the air. He could have hit him withing three yards but when the ball is let go it's hands off no matter what.

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Johnson stinks -- Bollinger may start
    By COJOMAY in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-29-2008, 07:21 AM
  2. Childress preaching patience
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-30-2007, 12:04 AM
  3. A start worth repeating - Johnson to start against Jets
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 12-14-2006, 02:48 PM
  4. The Start Wearing Purple Song
    By scottishvike in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-11-2006, 11:42 PM
  5. Marcus Johnson to start
    By natethegreat in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-23-2005, 04:23 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •