Thread: Jackson #2
-
Jackson #2
I think there is little doubt that Jackson should be the #2 over McMahon.
Granted he is playing second rate defense, but he is playing really well at that speed.
McMahon isn't worth the price of his jersey.
If we had a Collins in here, would I still call Jackson #2?
Unlikey, but we work with what we got....
So I will admit TJack is looking like a good pickup!
-
08-19-2006, 09:09 PM #2
Re: Jackson #2
"Webby" wrote:
I agree and it looks as if he is having a good game tonight.I think there is little doubt that Jackson should be the #2 over McMahon.
Granted he is playing second rate defense, but he is playing really well at that speed.
McMahon isn't worth the price of his jersey.
If we had a Collins in here, would I still call Jackson #2?
Unlikey, but we work with what we got....
So I will admit TJack is looking like a good pickup!Signature not changing until the Vikings win the Super Bowl. Started- 7/8/2005
-
08-19-2006, 09:10 PM #3
Re: Jackson #2
I wasn't able to tune in until about the last couple minutes of the second half.
Was TJ playing the Steelers first or second string defense?
He looked great, again!
Nice effort by Jones to get that TD btw - nice to see people catching TJ's passes in the red zone
;DPM me if you'd like a sig.

-
08-19-2006, 09:11 PM #4
Re: Jackson #2
What has he done tonight?

-
08-19-2006, 09:14 PM #5
Re: Jackson #2
It's hard to disagree with the original post. McMahon=not good.

I get the most pissed off looks from people with my VKG 4 LFE Wisconsin license plate, and I LOVE IT!!
-
08-19-2006, 09:16 PM #6
Re: Jackson #2
"westvirginiavikings" wrote:
9/11 for 80 yards and one TD.What has he done tonight?
The TD was brought in by Jones, who made a great diving effort to get the ball inside the pylon.
I think his most impressive moments were when the Steelers brought the blitz and TJ handled it pretty well.
On one play he dumped the ball off to I think Wiggins for a bit of a gain, and then managed to get rid of it as he was going down in the pocket and near enough to a receiver to avoid the intentional grounding call.
Granted, he is playing second string, but the kid is definitely not looking nearly as much of a "project" as was thought.
PM me if you'd like a sig.

-
08-19-2006, 09:21 PM #7
Re: Jackson #2
Hopefully he'll be able to handle playing against the first one day.
McMahon sucks
-
08-19-2006, 09:21 PM #8
Re: Jackson #2
What does Childress see in Mcmahon??
I hope his mind is changed about him being our number 2 after that interception he just threw.

[move]My beautiful sig made by the one and only PPE![/move]
-
08-19-2006, 09:22 PM #9
Re: Jackson #2
I see no reason why McMahon should even be considered with T-Jack? We had a nice drive rolling and he goes and makes an absolutely UGLY int.
:-X
-
08-19-2006, 09:28 PM #10
Re: Jackson #2
"WBLVikeBabe" wrote:
Jut because Chlidress knew him with the Eagles, he didn't have to bring him along.What does Childress see in Mcmahon??
I hope his mind is changed about him being our number 2 after that interception he just threw.

Similar Threads
-
T-Jackson
By sotaman300m in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 6Last Post: 09-09-2008, 07:39 PM -
Jackson: 'I got a lot better'
By cogitans in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 121Last Post: 01-11-2008, 02:13 PM -
Jackson Sig
By revprodeji in forum Help / Suggestion BoxReplies: 7Last Post: 05-26-2006, 09:15 PM -
Huff+D.Jackson sig?
By revprodeji in forum Help / Suggestion BoxReplies: 15Last Post: 03-16-2006, 08:58 AM -
Jackson Maybe Next...
By MuzikQ in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 41Last Post: 03-13-2006, 06:42 AM



Reply With Quote








Bookmarks