Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Thread: Jackson #2

  1. #1
    Webby's Avatar
    Webby is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 1998
    Location
    A, A
    Posts
    8,976
    Blog Entries
    6

    Jackson #2

    I think there is little doubt that Jackson should be the #2 over McMahon.

    Granted he is playing second rate defense, but he is playing really well at that speed.


    McMahon isn't worth the price of his jersey.
    If we had a Collins in here, would I still call Jackson #2?
    Unlikey, but we work with what we got....

    So I will admit TJack is looking like a good pickup!

  2. #2
    outcast316's Avatar
    outcast316 is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    301

    Re: Jackson #2

    "Webby" wrote:
    I think there is little doubt that Jackson should be the #2 over McMahon.

    Granted he is playing second rate defense, but he is playing really well at that speed.


    McMahon isn't worth the price of his jersey.

    If we had a Collins in here, would I still call Jackson #2?
    Unlikey, but we work with what we got....

    So I will admit TJack is looking like a good pickup!
    I agree and it looks as if he is having a good game tonight.
    Signature not changing until the Vikings win the Super Bowl. Started- 7/8/2005

  3. #3
    oddmanout22287 is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    374

    Re: Jackson #2

    I wasn't able to tune in until about the last couple minutes of the second half.
    Was TJ playing the Steelers first or second string defense?
    He looked great, again!
    Nice effort by Jones to get that TD btw - nice to see people catching TJ's passes in the red zone
    ;D
    PM me if you'd like a sig.

  4. #4
    BadlandsVikings's Avatar
    BadlandsVikings is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    26,564

    Re: Jackson #2

    What has he done tonight?

  5. #5
    VKG4LFE's Avatar
    VKG4LFE is offline Jersey Retired Tetris Champion, Monkey GO Happy 4 Champion
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Hartford, WI
    Posts
    15,991

    Re: Jackson #2

    It's hard to disagree with the original post. McMahon=not good.

    I get the most pissed off looks from people with my VKG 4 LFE Wisconsin license plate, and I LOVE IT!!

  6. #6
    oddmanout22287 is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    374

    Re: Jackson #2

    "westvirginiavikings" wrote:
    What has he done tonight?
    9/11 for 80 yards and one TD.
    The TD was brought in by Jones, who made a great diving effort to get the ball inside the pylon.
    I think his most impressive moments were when the Steelers brought the blitz and TJ handled it pretty well.
    On one play he dumped the ball off to I think Wiggins for a bit of a gain, and then managed to get rid of it as he was going down in the pocket and near enough to a receiver to avoid the intentional grounding call.

    Granted, he is playing second string, but the kid is definitely not looking nearly as much of a "project" as was thought.
    PM me if you'd like a sig.

  7. #7
    BadlandsVikings's Avatar
    BadlandsVikings is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    26,564

    Re: Jackson #2

    Hopefully he'll be able to handle playing against the first one day.

    McMahon sucks

  8. #8
    WBLVikeBabe's Avatar
    WBLVikeBabe is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    5,614

    Re: Jackson #2

    What does Childress see in Mcmahon??
    I hope his mind is changed about him being our number 2 after that interception he just threw.

    [move]My beautiful sig made by the one and only PPE![/move]

  9. #9
    jpape's Avatar
    jpape is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    26

    Re: Jackson #2

    I see no reason why McMahon should even be considered with T-Jack? We had a nice drive rolling and he goes and makes an absolutely UGLY int.
    :-X

  10. #10
    BadlandsVikings's Avatar
    BadlandsVikings is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    26,564

    Re: Jackson #2

    "WBLVikeBabe" wrote:
    What does Childress see in Mcmahon??
    I hope his mind is changed about him being our number 2 after that interception he just threw.
    Jut because Chlidress knew him with the Eagles, he didn't have to bring him along.

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. T-Jackson
    By sotaman300m in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-09-2008, 07:39 PM
  2. Jackson: 'I got a lot better'
    By cogitans in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 121
    Last Post: 01-11-2008, 02:13 PM
  3. Jackson Sig
    By revprodeji in forum Help / Suggestion Box
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-26-2006, 09:15 PM
  4. Huff+D.Jackson sig?
    By revprodeji in forum Help / Suggestion Box
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-16-2006, 08:58 AM
  5. Jackson Maybe Next...
    By MuzikQ in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 03-13-2006, 06:42 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •