It's what's in store 3-4

**jargomcfargo** · 10-20-2007, 11:18 PM

Passes to the tight end. Quick openers up the middle.Two tight end sets with a fullback.Screens. Draws.Play action. Short passes over the middle. All are good choices against the 3-4.
I will take the number one rushing team against the number seven rush defence.
No team can shut Peterson and Taylor down all day.

**UTVikfan** · 10-20-2007, 11:26 PM

No team can shut down Peterson and Taylor all day. Oh so true! Can't wait for this game.

**singersp** · 10-20-2007, 11:36 PM

"UTVikfan" wrote:

No team can shut down Peterson and Taylor all day. Oh so true! Can't wait for this game.

The guy on NFL.com does.

http://www.nfl.com/home

Click the video in the upper left corner that says "Can Dallas Stop Him?"

**tb04512** · 10-21-2007, 12:06 AM

"singersp" wrote:

"UTVikfan" wrote:

No team can shut down Peterson and Taylor all day. Oh so true! Can't wait for this game.

The guy on NFL.com does.

http://www.nfl.com/home

Click the video in the upper left corner that says "Can Dallas Stop Him?"

haha they had film clips of benson and sammie morris? hardly AP, AP is a beast that can run inside and can run outside

**jessejames09** · 10-21-2007, 12:10 AM

Do you really think a MLB is going to stuff AD at the line day in and day out? 3-4 relies on those 2 Mikes to get up and fill the 2 large gaps in the line. I see AD busting a lot of 7-15 yard runs. And he could even turn a few of those loose.

**jessejames09** · 10-21-2007, 12:13 AM

Plus Shank dog needs to have a big day against Roy,I'm a linebacker playing safety, Williams. I see old Roy gettin torched once or twice too.

**Marrdro** · 10-21-2007, 05:28 AM

"sleepagent" wrote:

"singersp" wrote:

"PurpleGator" wrote:

I am all about the 3-4 D.

I like it better and I think more defenses succeed compared to the 4-3.

It's better against the passing game which most teams are focusing on, compared to the running game.

What would happen to our #1 rush defense if we went to the 3-4?

The article had an interesting note about that . . .

"The 3-4 also can be strong against the run. In fact, three of the league's top five run defenses -- No. 3 Baltimore, No. 4 Pittsburgh and No. 5 New England -- use the 3-4. Dallas ranks seventh and San Diego eighth. That will come in handy against the Vikings, who have the No. 1-ranked running attack (170.2)."

Conversely . . . I wonder how our Passing "D" compares to theirs?

Remembering of course how bad we sucked at it (3-4) during K-wills first year.
Read an article the other day on Scout were K-will was saying how much he hated the 3-4.

**Prophet** · 10-21-2007, 06:20 AM

"jargomcfargo" wrote:

Passes to the tight end. Quick openers up the middle.Two tight end sets with a fullback.Screens. Draws.Play action. Short passes over the middle. All are good choices against the 3-4.
I will take the number one rushing team against the number seven rush defence.
No team can shut Peterson and Taylor down all day.

Chiller is the only person that can, if he panics and gives up on the run.
I'm hoping for a no penalty game for the Vikings.