Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1
    hawaiianvike21 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,412

    Interesting picture.




    It also mentioned the refs and the upstairs booth opted NOT to review the kickoff fumble as well. :roll:
    Hupo oe ke kau ana i ka waiupa a ma kou pa o & Hupo na Po o waiupa a


  2. #2
    VikingsTw is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,144

    Interesting picture.

    I guess we will never really know who came out with it but sure in the hell know who had possesion of it before the pile up. Those kinds of plays should be reviewable.

  3. #3
    hawaiianvike21 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,412

    Interesting picture.

    Again whose decisions are those to be made in crucial moments like these? The refs! All they had to review the damn thing and it could/most likely be in our favor had they even tried to review it. But thats just how the refs at green bay are. :roll:
    Hupo oe ke kau ana i ka waiupa a ma kou pa o & Hupo na Po o waiupa a


  4. #4
    PhxFan's Avatar
    PhxFan is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    460

    Interesting picture.


  5. #5
    snowinapril's Avatar
    snowinapril is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    13,404

    Interesting picture.

    Anyone see the [size=18px]NO CALL FUMBLE[/size] in the Eagles/Cowboys game on MNF.

    They didn't even see the fumble and spotted the ball where the returner landed on the ground. The ball was about 3 yds behind him.

  6. #6
    SKOL's Avatar
    SKOL is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,735

    Interesting picture.

    I don't want to beat a dead horse, but this is my first time venting on the kickoff-fumble. Yes, D. Ross unquestionably recovered the fumble. While the clearest camera view was from behind when he secured the ball, he was clearly covering the ball, HE WAS NOT making additional efforts to secure it since he already had it. The dual possession call was week, and in my mind was just a cop-out so the refs didn't have to deal with the home crowd. All one of the Packers had to do was get his hands on the ball at the same time as Ross and the dual possession call would go the Packers way. The call sucked, and yes we were robbed... so there, I'm done venting. I feel better :lol:

    The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good -Samuel Johnson - lexicographer
    The word genius isn t applicable in football. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein - Joe Theisman

  7. #7
    XTAP59's Avatar
    XTAP59 is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    777

    Interesting picture.

    This just leads to the belief that the refs are biased, and human, and for whatever reason, personal, political, monetary, they control the outcome of certain games.

    Afteral, the NFL is a business, and they want the best product on the field, and meaning best product, the teams with the best stories behind it.

    Quick case in point is Peyton manning. He threw 5 TD passes in three games this season. ESPN said it was a record and he is on pace to break Marino's record of 48. Not a single mention that Culpepper has also thrown 5 TD passes in three games this season as well. But since Moss is out, the NFL jumps on Peyton bandwagon.

    LURKING ON THE GRASSY KNOLL
    http://lotgk.wordpress.com

  8. #8
    dan3ski's Avatar
    dan3ski is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    878

    Interesting picture.

    I believe any call like that should be viewed automaticly by the booth as in the case of the TO TD against the Vikings earlier this year. Take the flag away from the coaches and do what is right. It will stop the stupid flag throwing and let the players not the refs decide the game!
    can we clone Bud Grant?

  9. #9
    SKOL's Avatar
    SKOL is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,735

    Interesting picture.

    One major problem I see with replays is that the Field Judge approaches his review with the biased opinion that the officials are right. There has to be "indisputable evidence" to overturn their call. That's bogus. Why do they have to use a biased approach when reviewing a play? It's too bad they just can't review the play, and make a call based on what they see, using all the angles, slow motion, or whatever other technology they're privy to. Who care's what call was made on the field by the officials.

    This is something that the competition committee needs to seriously consider.

    The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good -Samuel Johnson - lexicographer
    The word genius isn t applicable in football. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein - Joe Theisman

  10. #10
    LosAngelis's Avatar
    LosAngelis is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,735

    Interesting picture.

    I guess I don't know. I know this is coming from a Packer fan who is happy they called it this way, but how many years have we heard announcers talking and talking about how everytime there's a fumble, there's "finger getting poked in the eyes", "the ball switches hands about five times", and "there stuff going on under that pile that we can't mention on the air".

    While I agree the refs sucked, and may have screwed up that call NOT by giving the Packers the ball, but by not reviewing it, if Steele took the ball away from Ross a second before the ref unpiled them, that's kind of the way its "always been". Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to tick you guys off, but I have a feeling this is a call that isn't unusual in football, but moreso came at a really critical point in the game, and was compounded by not reviewing.

    Now, let's consider this:

    Steele maintains that he had possession all along. I hypothesize that Ross had initial possession before the scrum started, Steele took it away underneath, and when the ref saw him with the ball, Steele let go and Ross ran out of the pile with the ball Steele let go

    Technically, this could be made the Vikings ball in review.

    However, could you imagine the complaining by the Packer fans and team if they did award it? Steele said when he was unpiled that the ref said, "Let it go, 82, you've got it". So, he lets it go.

    Then, a review says the Vikings have it? After the ref told him by number he had possession? When there is really only a millisecond of game footage showing Ross with possession before the scrum landed on him?

    No matter the call, the NFL would be apologizing to someone for it. The refs should have called possession one way or another right away, before the players even started piling, and allowed replay to do its job. By waiting and unpiling, the review was taken out of the play and didn't do its job.

    It reminds me of the Owens TD against you guys. In that case, the refs DID do the right thing in calling it a TD, and Tice didn't throw his flag to reverse the call and allow replay to do its job.

    The refs screwed up by awarding the ball to the strongest man under the pile, and how is review going to change that?

    Just my thoughts.
    Have you ever seen a race of turtles, and they all go the wrong way instead of towards the finish line?

    Welcome to the NFC North.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Looking for picture...
    By minvikes01 in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-29-2007, 12:21 AM
  2. The Big Picture
    By Purple Grandma in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-19-2006, 02:42 AM
  3. picture to a sig
    By Burley81 in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-21-2005, 01:25 PM
  4. My Picture
    By duffVIkEs in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-14-2005, 05:05 PM
  5. NFC picture
    By ksvikesfan in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-08-2004, 06:38 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •