Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    FootballGeek70 is offline Waterboy
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2

    Interesting formula has Vikes at #4

    This formula tries to determine who is for real and who isn't.
    It has the Bears #1, but lists them as overachievers.
    Interesting.

    http://www.malconium.com/Rankings/rankings.html

  2. #2
    Prophet's Avatar
    Prophet is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    17,388

    Re: Interesting formula has Vikes at #4

    Interesting formula, yet another smokescreen disguised as the truth.
    Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain

  3. #3
    mr.woo's Avatar
    mr.woo is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,213

    Re: Interesting formula has Vikes at #4

    looks like AWZUES has some competion for the best rankings in profootball.
    woo out
    just two corn cobs shy of a bushel

  4. #4
    Zeus's Avatar
    Zeus is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota.
    Posts
    23,937

    Re: Interesting formula has Vikes at #4

    "mr.woo" wrote:
    looks like AWZUES has some competion for the best rankings in profootball.
    Formula, schmormula.

    The Final Word Power Poll is just that.
    Everyone else is spinning their wheels trying to come up with something so brilliant, yet simple.

    =Z=

    Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!

  5. #5
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,601
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Interesting formula has Vikes at #4

    Hmmm, I actually like this formula. It tries to predict teams who have over inflated win loss records (like the bears and the saints) as well as ones that are under achieving (like the Dolphins and the ... uh Lions?).
    OK, so maybe it is not perfect.
    If my interpretatin is correct, teams that are overachieving can be expected to fall in the rankings, while underachieving teams should rise.
    The greater the diff number, the larger the expected move.
    Looks to me like they expect Seattle to fall the most, and the lions to rise the most.

    Interesting to point out that while it has the Pats ranked one higher than us, it also identifies them as a team with an inflated win loss record...
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=

Similar Threads

  1. The Official 2010 Formula 1 Thread
    By scottishvike in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-12-2010, 10:34 PM
  2. Interesting pre-season assessment on Vikes from Wilf
    By COJOMAY in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-06-2008, 02:39 AM
  3. Interesting Take On The Vikes From The Steeler Website
    By COJOMAY in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 06-16-2007, 01:08 AM
  4. Two WR the Vikes are looking at... (Interesting)
    By COJOMAY in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-27-2007, 09:01 AM
  5. Formula 1 Pit Babes
    By Zeus in forum Two Beer Minimum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-28-2007, 07:57 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •