Thread: Inside the NFL: Vikings not worth mention?

I guess the 7th overall pick having a 160 yard FIRST GAME, let alone the D, is worth mentioning on HBO's Inside the NFL which used to be my favorite sports show. Even aside from them leaving out the Vikes, it was BORING,their discussions went nowhere, they didn't even go through all their picks for week 2, and their show is still 4:3 standard definition because only everyone I know has access to HDTV, and there's also regular HBO for people who don't.

I wish I had HDTV

"DeathtoDenny" wrote:

I guess the 7th overall pick having a 160 yard FIRST GAME, let alone the D, is worth mentioning on HBO's Inside the NFL which used to be my favorite sports show. Even aside from them leaving out the Vikes, it was BORING,their discussions went nowhere, they didn't even go through all their picks for week 2, and their show is still 4:3 standard definition because only everyone I know has access to HDTV, and there's also regular HBO for people who don't.

They didn't show any Viking highlights.
I guess I don't need to watch it when it re-broadcasts.

i watched the entire thing waiting for the vikes highlites
and nothing, not even a mention.


ERRRRRRRRR

Don't be surprised when we still get little to no LOVE after we put a hurtin' on Detroit this week.
A.D. can get another 100 yd game, and they'll probably still rave about the rookie WR that only gets 1 pass thrown in his general direction due to a Purple Haze defense with a fog so thick, that Kitna won't see 5 ft. in front of his face!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But...............In time, they will all see the light!!!!

yah but i'm sure that oh so exciting packer/eagle game got a 15 minute discussion.
all i've heard so far since week one is can detroit or green bay challenge the bears for the division after a not so great start by the bears.
ummmmm, excuse me, i know we didn't beat mcnown and the raiders, or beat the eagles at home cuz of special team muffs, but holding any nfl team to 3 points and scoring 2 defensive tds should at least warrant mention.
the falcons aren't exactly the colts, but there not exactly as bad as the raiders either.
whatever.
f--- the media.

"bigbadragz" wrote:

yah but i'm sure that oh so exciting packer/eagle game got a 15 minute discussion.
all i've heard so far since week one is can detroit or green bay challenge the bears for the division after a not so great start by the bears.
ummmmm, excuse me, i know we didn't beat mcnown and the raiders, or beat the eagles at home cuz of special team muffs, but holding any nfl team to 3 points and scoring 2 defensive tds should at least warrant mention.

the falcons aren't exactly the colts, but there not exactly as bad as the raiders either.
whatever.
f--- the media.

Well said. 8)

"bigbadragz" wrote:

yah but i'm sure that oh so exciting packer/eagle game got a 15 minute discussion.
all i've heard so far since week one is can detroit or green bay challenge the bears for the division after a not so great start by the bears.
ummmmm, excuse me, i know we didn't beat mcnown and the raiders, or beat the eagles at home cuz of special team muffs, but holding any nfl team to 3 points and scoring 2 defensive tds should at least warrant mention.

the falcons aren't exactly the colts, but there not exactly as bad as the raiders either.
whatever.
f--- the media.

Look the Vikes did well ... but everyone had them penned in to win this game ... it is not like it was a huge surprise. And actually ... I think many would say the Falcons are as bad as the Raiders. Atlanta very well could be picking Brian Brohm with the first pick of next year's draft.

The media hates the vikings.They are only obsessed with vick,favre,and the patriots

Yeah, the media is only concerned with the "large market" teams like the Pats, Cowboys, and so on.
I see more Raiders coverage than Vikes coverage.
Even worse is that the Fox affiliate up here in Alaska always plays the Seahawks and/or Packers games.