Thread: I am a better QB than Brooks Bollinger.

Bollinger's statistics:

2004: 0 TDs, O INTs
2005: 6 INTS, lost 7 games
2006: 0 TDs, 1 INT
2007: 1 INT, lost 1 game

Prophet's statistics:

2004: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (draw)
2005: 0 INTs, lost 0 games (decision-Prophet)
2006: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (decision-Prophet)
2007: 0 INTs, 0 losses (decision-Prophet)

In summary, 75% of the seasons I had better statistics than Bollinger.
The other 25% was a draw.
Make the bastard walk the plank.

haha, did he lose all his games with the Jets?

"Prophet" wrote:

Bollinger's statistics:

2004: 0 TDs, O INTs
2005: 6 INTS, lost 7 games
2006: 0 TDs, 1 INT
2007: 1 INT, lost 1 game

Prophet's statistics:

2004: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (draw)
2005: 0 INTs, lost 0 games (decision-Prophet)
2006: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (decision-Prophet)
2007: 0 INTs, 0 losses (decision-Prophet)

In summary, 75% of the seasons I had better statistics than Bollinger.
The other 25% was a draw.
Make the bastard walk the plank.

Maybe he gives a better hummer.

Could you please break down how you compare to him in that category? It could really be the deciding factor in a close race.

Who isn't?

"ItalianStallion" wrote:

haha, did he lose all his games with the Jets?

He won a couple, but, why ruin a good story with the truth?

Can we just cut him now? HE SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"UffDaVikes" wrote:

"Prophet" wrote:

Bollinger's statistics:

2004: 0 TDs, O INTs
2005: 6 INTS, lost 7 games
2006: 0 TDs, 1 INT
2007: 1 INT, lost 1 game

Prophet's statistics:

2004: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (draw)
2005: 0 INTs, lost 0 games (decision-Prophet)
2006: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (decision-Prophet)
2007: 0 INTs, 0 losses (decision-Prophet)

In summary, 75% of the seasons I had better statistics than Bollinger.
The other 25% was a draw.
Make the bastard walk the plank.

Maybe he gives a better hummer.

Could you please break down how you compare to him in that category? It could really be the deciding factor in a close race.

Bollinger's statistics: hummers given

2004: 0
2005: 0
2006: 1 (to chilly for a roster spot)
2007: 5 (to chilly to stay on the roster)

Prophet's statistics:
hummers given

2004: 0
2005: 0
2006: 0
2007: 0

So, he has me 6:0 in that category.
That still gives me the edge in the comparison, a hummer given is not a hummer earned.

"Prophet" wrote:

"UffDaVikes" wrote:

"Prophet" wrote:

Bollinger's statistics:

2004: 0 TDs, O INTs
2005: 6 INTS, lost 7 games
2006: 0 TDs, 1 INT
2007: 1 INT, lost 1 game

Prophet's statistics:

2004: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (draw)
2005: 0 INTs, lost 0 games (decision-Prophet)
2006: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (decision-Prophet)
2007: 0 INTs, 0 losses (decision-Prophet)

In summary, 75% of the seasons I had better statistics than Bollinger.
The other 25% was a draw.
Make the bastard walk the plank.

Maybe he gives a better hummer.

Could you please break down how you compare to him in that category? It could really be the deciding factor in a close race.

Bollinger's statistics: hummers given

2004: 0
2005: 0
2006: 1 (to chilly for a roster spot)
2007: 5 (to chilly to stay on the roster)

Prophet's statistics:
hummers given

2004: 0
2005: 0
2006: 0
2007: 0

So, he has me 6:0 in that category.
That still gives me the edge in the comparison, a hummer given is not a hummer earned.

I guess that settles it.
;D

best thread ever

Well I did read you have a better Madden rating.
;D