Printable View
Bollinger's statistics:
2004: 0 TDs, O INTs
2005: 6 INTS, lost 7 games
2006: 0 TDs, 1 INT
2007: 1 INT, lost 1 game
Prophet's statistics:
2004: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (draw)
2005: 0 INTs, lost 0 games (decision-Prophet)
2006: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (decision-Prophet)
2007: 0 INTs, 0 losses (decision-Prophet)
In summary, 75% of the seasons I had better statistics than Bollinger.
The other 25% was a draw.
Make the bastard walk the plank.
haha, did he lose all his games with the Jets?
"Prophet" wrote:
Maybe he gives a better hummer.Quote:
Bollinger's statistics:
2004: 0 TDs, O INTs
2005: 6 INTS, lost 7 games
2006: 0 TDs, 1 INT
2007: 1 INT, lost 1 game
Prophet's statistics:
2004: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (draw)
2005: 0 INTs, lost 0 games (decision-Prophet)
2006: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (decision-Prophet)
2007: 0 INTs, 0 losses (decision-Prophet)
In summary, 75% of the seasons I had better statistics than Bollinger.
The other 25% was a draw.
Make the bastard walk the plank.
Could you please break down how you compare to him in that category? It could really be the deciding factor in a close race.
Who isn't?
"ItalianStallion" wrote:
He won a couple, but, why ruin a good story with the truth?Quote:
haha, did he lose all his games with the Jets?
Can we just cut him now? HE SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"UffDaVikes" wrote:
Bollinger's statistics: hummers givenQuote:
"Prophet" wrote:
Maybe he gives a better hummer.Quote:
Bollinger's statistics:
2004: 0 TDs, O INTs
2005: 6 INTS, lost 7 games
2006: 0 TDs, 1 INT
2007: 1 INT, lost 1 game
Prophet's statistics:
2004: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (draw)
2005: 0 INTs, lost 0 games (decision-Prophet)
2006: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (decision-Prophet)
2007: 0 INTs, 0 losses (decision-Prophet)
In summary, 75% of the seasons I had better statistics than Bollinger.
The other 25% was a draw.
Make the bastard walk the plank.
Could you please break down how you compare to him in that category? It could really be the deciding factor in a close race.
2004: 0
2005: 0
2006: 1 (to chilly for a roster spot)
2007: 5 (to chilly to stay on the roster)
Prophet's statistics:
hummers given
2004: 0
2005: 0
2006: 0
2007: 0
So, he has me 6:0 in that category.
That still gives me the edge in the comparison, a hummer given is not a hummer earned.
"Prophet" wrote:
I guess that settles it.Quote:
"UffDaVikes" wrote:
Bollinger's statistics: hummers givenQuote:
"Prophet" wrote:
Maybe he gives a better hummer.Quote:
Bollinger's statistics:
2004: 0 TDs, O INTs
2005: 6 INTS, lost 7 games
2006: 0 TDs, 1 INT
2007: 1 INT, lost 1 game
Prophet's statistics:
2004: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (draw)
2005: 0 INTs, lost 0 games (decision-Prophet)
2006: 0 TDs, 0 INTs (decision-Prophet)
2007: 0 INTs, 0 losses (decision-Prophet)
In summary, 75% of the seasons I had better statistics than Bollinger.
The other 25% was a draw.
Make the bastard walk the plank.
Could you please break down how you compare to him in that category? It could really be the deciding factor in a close race.
2004: 0
2005: 0
2006: 1 (to chilly for a roster spot)
2007: 5 (to chilly to stay on the roster)
Prophet's statistics:
hummers given
2004: 0
2005: 0
2006: 0
2007: 0
So, he has me 6:0 in that category.
That still gives me the edge in the comparison, a hummer given is not a hummer earned.
;D
best thread ever
Well I did read you have a better Madden rating.
;D