how dumb is "the sporting news"?
Today I read what the sporting news said about the vikes for their 2006 nfl preview and it said we'll be third in the nfc north with a 6-10 record behind the pack who is supposed to have a 7-9 record. I believe we will at least get a 9-7 record or 10-6 but 6-10 c'mon!! They also said that our running game isn't going to be strong, that we had a "soft" o-line. How can they even say that when we got Birk, Hicks Hutch, McKinnie and Goldberg. They didn't even mention big Tony Richardson. They also said that the passing game and our defense is gonna suck. I'm so pissed oh they also said that chilldress loves passing game even though he already announced that he wants a power running game. :mad: :mad: :mad: :!: :!: :!:
Re: how dumb is "the sporting news"?
????? did you accidently post it twice? that's alright, i've done it before.