Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 54
  1. #41
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,601
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Lippythelion69 View Post
    Harvin knows with Punder at QB
    They won't win shit
    Anyone think otherwise??
    Yeah, cuz it's not like we went to the playoff last year... oh wait...

    I am not a Ponder fan, but that is beside the point. This had less to do with Harvin's opinion of Ponder, and moe to do with Harvin's opinion of Harvin...
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=

  2. #42
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Reinholds,Pa
    Posts
    225

    Harvin's Lost His Mind

    Look at the division
    Cutler
    Stafford
    Rodgers
    If your numbers are based on who throws the ball to you in NFC north
    Hhhmmmmm
    Punder ?????
    Anyone think Punder is better than them
    None

  3. #43
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,601
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Lippythelion69 View Post
    Look at the division
    Cutler
    Stafford
    Rodgers
    If your numbers are based on who throws the ball to you in NFC north
    Hhhmmmmm
    Punder ?????
    Anyone think Punder is better than them
    Nope.

    You aren't going to get me to defend Ponder. His ship sailed for me last season before the 4 game winning streak.

    But I am also not going to try and kid myself into thinking that Harvin would have been happier if we had Cutler or Stafford. Ponder wasn't the problem, Harvin was. He wants top 3 money for putting in average seasons. It just doesn't work that way.
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=

  4. #44
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Reinholds,Pa
    Posts
    225

    Harvin's Lost His Mind

    So I guess vikes are superbowl bound with Punder at QB
    None

  5. #45
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Reinholds,Pa
    Posts
    225

    Harvin's Lost His Mind

    Look I agree Harvin ain't worth megatron money
    But to have numbers as a wr you need a QB
    That's what gets used in contract bullshit
    And might be a blessing
    Harvin is an injury problem
    With migraine stuff
    I'm sick of losing good players
    Matt Birk should
    Have retired a Vike
    None

  6. #46
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,601
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Lippythelion69 View Post
    So I guess vikes are superbowl bound with Punder at QB
    You're right! DAMN, we were GUARANTEED a super bowl birth if only we had kept Harvin! <rolls eyes>

    Go bitch about Ponder in a different thread, not a Harvin one.
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Fairbanks, AK
    Posts
    1,148
    Would liked to have kept him, but, what does that free up? What, 3 mill extra in cap space? A little more scrilla to spend on a free agent. And another 1st round pick (25th) was good stuff. And if ya look at it, the deep, speedy wr is just not this offenses cup o tea. Fuck it. Im glad he's gone. Makes for an even more exciting draft anf fa period. Maybe package a few picks and move up? But for who?? The more I think about it, it could turn out very good for the team. Would still like to see the Vikes pick up Amendola. Solid, dependable. Any thoughts on the guy?
    Last edited by Jereamiah; 03-11-2013 at 02:52 PM.
    Tuco the world.....

  8. #48
    jmcdon00's Avatar
    jmcdon00 is offline Jersey Retired Snake Champion, Moto Trial Fest 2: Mountain Pack Champion, LL City Truck 2 Champion, Arithmetic sequence Champion, Troops Tower Defense Champion
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,278
    Quote Originally Posted by Lippythelion69 View Post
    Look at the division
    Cutler
    Stafford
    Rodgers
    If your numbers are based on who throws the ball to you in NFC north
    Hhhmmmmm
    Punder ?????
    Anyone think Punder is better than them
    When you factor in age, contracts, and weapons, I would take Ponder over Cutler.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Fairbanks, AK
    Posts
    1,148
    Quote Originally Posted by Lippythelion69 View Post
    Look at the division
    Cutler
    Stafford
    Rodgers
    If your numbers are based on who throws the ball to you in NFC north
    Hhhmmmmm
    Punder ?????
    Anyone think Punder is better than them
    PONDER, is better then all of except RODGUURS! And anyway, I feel the deep threat Wr is not for this current Offensive unit. Tight Ends over the middle and screen passes are whats going to help out Ponder. Harvin obviously felt that he wasn't being utilized correctly. It is what it is. As I said before: Fuck it, rub some dirt on it, move on and get excited about FA and two 1st round picks.
    Tuco the world.....

  10. #50
    AngloVike's Avatar
    AngloVike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Sandhurst, UK
    Posts
    6,777
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by NodakPaul View Post
    You're right! DAMN, we were GUARANTEED a super bowl birth if only we had kept Harvin! <rolls eyes>

    Go bitch about Ponder in a different thread, not a Harvin one.
    yep some people like to flog that horse every opportunity So back to the harvin discussion please
    Time spent annoying a Packer fan is never time wasted...


Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •