Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22
  1. #11
    GreenBaySlackers's Avatar
    GreenBaySlackers is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,249

    Green Bay! Fumble! INTs! Positive Revisitation

    ack? what is ack?

  2. #12
    snowinapril's Avatar
    snowinapril is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    13,404

    Re: Green Bay! Fumble! INTs! Positive Revisitation

    "LosAngelis" wrote:
    "VKG4LFE" wrote:

    I have to agree.
    Accckkk!! An alliance!
    It is like saying oh no!

    Oh no the vike fans are uniting and the team will unite and they will take that momentum all the way through the season and to the Superbowl.

    That kind of acckk, is that what you are refering to LOS.

  3. #13
    LosAngelis's Avatar
    LosAngelis is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,735

    Re: Green Bay! Fumble! INTs! Positive Revisitation

    "snowinapril" wrote:
    "LosAngelis" wrote:
    "VKG4LFE" wrote:

    I have to agree.
    Accckkk!! An alliance!
    It is like saying oh no!

    Oh no the vike fans are uniting and the team will unite and they will take that momentum all the way through the season and to the Superbowl.

    That kind of acckk, is that what you are refering to LOS.
    It's more "Aaccckkk! You don't have the immunity horned-helmet-and-braids toinght!" kind of "acck".
    Have you ever seen a race of turtles, and they all go the wrong way instead of towards the finish line?

    Welcome to the NFC North.

  4. #14
    snowinapril's Avatar
    snowinapril is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    13,404

    Green Bay! Fumble! INTs! Positive Revisitation

    I like the momentum theory Acckk better.

  5. #15
    ItalianStallion's Avatar
    ItalianStallion is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,615

    Green Bay! Fumble! INTs! Positive Revisitation

    Just so you know, that first fumble by GB, was not Udeze's ball. Fisher fumbled it, then landed on it in the endzone before Udeze pulled it away...touchdown.


    I m like a Ja Rule poster, cause I'm off the wall.

  6. #16
    XTAP59's Avatar
    XTAP59 is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    777

    Green Bay! Fumble! INTs! Positive Revisitation

    "GreenBaySlackers" wrote:
    ack? what is ack?
    If memory serves me, I believe "Ack" was one of the holy words of the Knights who say Nei.....
    Or was that....

    ecki, ecki, ecki, nei, wampooh......

    LURKING ON THE GRASSY KNOLL
    http://lotgk.wordpress.com

  7. #17
    snowinapril's Avatar
    snowinapril is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    13,404

    Green Bay! Fumble! INTs! Positive Revisitation

    "ItalianStallion" wrote:
    Just so you know, that first fumble by GB, was not Udeze's ball. Fisher fumbled it, then landed on it in the endzone before Udeze pulled it away...touchdown.
    That being said, he never covered it for more than a milli second. The ball was behind him and he had his hands on it but one could argue he never had possession of it. But that is not my point.

    The point is that if they are going to call Fishers cover of the ball possession, they need to call Davis cover of the ball, possession. But my overall point is we should have wrapped the game up way before the fumbles.

    In Tice's press conference, he said that Burleson had a hell of a game but should have caught the dropped pass and would have scored six. But we had to settle for the FG instead. The difference is 4 points plus the differnce of the 2 int in the redzone that Williams dropped which is another 10 points. That is 14 points all together. 34 minus 14 is 20.

    Final score 31-20 Vikings. But the vikings lost the games because of the lack of carpi diem.

    WE LOST THE GAME OURSELVES

    A packer fan asked me before the game, "which Favre will show up, the one that heaves ball for INTs or the one that plays great football?"

    Well the one that heaves balls for INTs showed up but we didn't catch the INTs. (how do you like that LOS?)

  8. #18
    hawaiianvike21 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,412

    Green Bay! Fumble! INTs! Positive Revisitation

    "ItalianStallion" wrote:
    Just so you know, that first fumble by GB, was not Udeze's ball. Fisher fumbled it, then landed on it in the endzone before Udeze pulled it away...touchdown.

    YOu sure about that, i swear to god that ball poped out and out of the pile came udeze. NO sign of him recovering the ball in fishers point of view.
    Hupo oe ke kau ana i ka waiupa a ma kou pa o & Hupo na Po o waiupa a


  9. #19
    LosAngelis's Avatar
    LosAngelis is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,735

    Green Bay! Fumble! INTs! Positive Revisitation

    "snowinapril" wrote:

    Well the one that heaves balls for INTs showed up but we didn't catch the INTs. (how do you like that LOS?)
    Actually, I've made the point several times that the last pass he threw to Fisher was easily pickable-offable, Chavous would have had decent coverage and position.

    But, given the coverage, I do think that was the only place he could have put it and made a first down.

    I just recorded the NFL Game of the week last night and was watching the game again. I found it funny they showed NO replays of the Ferguson fumble other than the press box angle.

    And, even though the game was over days ago, I found my stomach twisting into knots as the Viking scored 14 points in the 4th Quarter.
    Have you ever seen a race of turtles, and they all go the wrong way instead of towards the finish line?

    Welcome to the NFC North.

  10. #20
    ItalianStallion's Avatar
    ItalianStallion is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,615

    Green Bay! Fumble! INTs! Positive Revisitation

    "hawaiianvike21" wrote:
    "ItalianStallion" wrote:
    Just so you know, that first fumble by GB, was not Udeze's ball. Fisher fumbled it, then landed on it in the endzone before Udeze pulled it away...touchdown.

    YOu sure about that, i swear to god that ball poped out and out of the pile came udeze. NO sign of him recovering the ball in fishers point of view.
    Fisher clearly landed on it in the endzone. Even if only for a millisecond that is a touchdown.


    I m like a Ja Rule poster, cause I'm off the wall.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Romo 4 INTs and counting (MNF Special)
    By mblack76 in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 10-09-2007, 10:22 AM
  2. MOVED: Romo 4 INTs and counting (MNF Special)
    By ultravikingfan in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-08-2007, 09:03 PM
  3. I predict that the Rams D gets 4 INTs this Sunday!!!
    By cajunvike in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-05-2006, 01:29 PM
  4. FIRST FUMBLE
    By vikesfan in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-17-2004, 08:55 PM
  5. Green Bay Fumble Recoveries
    By snowinapril in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-15-2004, 01:46 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •