Thread: ESPN's top 64 Receivers

Our weak link is the quarterback play, or lack there of.
If TJ played better, or we had a seasoned vet our WRs would have much better stats/ranking.

"davike" wrote:

"vikings4life33" wrote:

i played ball with hackett in highschool and watched all his games. i think he would have been a great pick up for us

Really? Thats cool! You still keep in touch wtih him at all?

no, i wish i did. i was a year older then him and started over him go figure but we lost touch when he went to college. i would love to see him around. i think his dad still lives in the area so maybe one day we will run into eachother.

"PacNWVike" wrote:

Our weak link is the quarterback play, or lack there of.
If TJ played better, or we had a seasoned vet our WRs would have much better stats/ranking.

we had one guy in the top 50 ranking last year.... and he was a rookie... that doesnt really help out our QB

are QB was in his second year and didnt have a receiver he could count on...

with the fact that as a team the vikings where sacked 38 times which ranks 20th in league, which isnt good, and then add the fact we passed less the anybody in the league makes it even worse...
we where sacked once every 11.2 PA thats isnt good so its not all on Tjack...

We need to get consistent O-line protection, QB play and WR play to have a good threat at passing the ball... its not just one or two of them we need to have a good passing threat its all three.

So you cant just blame one of them tho...