-
07-10-2008, 04:58 PM #51
Re: ESPN rates top receiving Cores in NFL
"i_bleed_purple" wrote:
As a matter of fact, yes I can.ok, think of it this way.
In order to make a list based on your criteria, you would need to be VERY familiar with the players.
We could easilly make a guess as to how we think our recievers ill pan out htis year, because thats all we talk about, but could you rate the jets, or the jags, or the titans as well and as in depth as you could the vikings??
probably not.
And I certainly don't think the ESPN writers could either.
But there are still many other teams I could not. And i understand your point, I just felt like breaking balls.
-
07-10-2008, 05:09 PM #52
Re: ESPN rates top receiving Cores in NFL
I'll take Berrian, Rice, Wade, and Allison over Mason, Clayton, Williams, and Figurs anyday.
"I hate when threads are destroyed by facts and logic."
- Prophet

Thanks Josdin!
-
07-10-2008, 05:12 PM #53
Re: ESPN rates top receiving Cores in NFL
"i_bleed_purple" wrote:
Yes, it would be hard, but it would also be much more accurate.ok, think of it this way.
In order to make a list based on your criteria, you would need to be VERY familiar with the players.
We could easilly make a guess as to how we think our recievers ill pan out htis year, because thats all we talk about, but could you rate the jets, or the jags, or the titans as well and as in depth as you could the vikings??
probably not.
And I certainly don't think the ESPN writers could either.
It's also their fucking job. The post it as-if its the end-all-be-all rankings, yet an average fan can shoot holes in it after 5 minutes. Thats pathetic."I hate when threads are destroyed by facts and logic."
- Prophet

Thanks Josdin!
-
Re: ESPN rates top receiving Cores in NFL
yes, its their job, but have you seen one well written article ever where the writer isn't writing about their local team or favourite team, and they get all the facts right, as well as know all there is to konw about the players?
No.
Honestly, I think at leastt a quarter of us on this site have the same football knowledge as these so called "experts"
-
07-10-2008, 06:23 PM #55
Re: ESPN rates top receiving Cores in NFL
"i_bleed_purple" wrote:
So you're saying that mediocrity is acceptable because its expected?yes, its their job, but have you seen one well written article ever where the writer isn't writing about their local team or favourite team, and they get all the facts right, as well as know all there is to konw about the players?
No.
Honestly, I think at leastt a quarter of us on this site have the same football knowledge as these so called "experts""I hate when threads are destroyed by facts and logic."
- Prophet

Thanks Josdin!
-
07-10-2008, 06:34 PM #56
Re: ESPN rates top receiving Cores in NFL
definite upgrade w/o that POS Williamson here

-
07-10-2008, 06:34 PM #57
Re: ESPN rates top receiving Cores in NFL
"i_bleed_purple" wrote:
The diffrence is, they studied for it, they know inside stuff we don't know and they do a hell of a job putting things on paper. I don't think people should underestimate the job of a journalistyes, its their job, but have you seen one well written article ever where the writer isn't writing about their local team or favourite team, and they get all the facts right, as well as know all there is to konw about the players?
No.
Honestly, I think at leastt a quarter of us on this site have the same football knowledge as these so called "experts"Rosie O'Donnell is a dude!
Similar Threads
-
Can you name all 95 players with 3+ receiving tds?
By i_bleed_purple in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 5Last Post: 01-16-2010, 09:16 PM -
NFL Networks Top 10 Receiving Corps
By marstc09 in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 12Last Post: 05-27-2008, 05:05 AM -
MMQB - Peter King rates the starting QBs
By Zeus in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 23Last Post: 06-19-2007, 04:13 AM -
Super Bowl Ad Rates & Ticket prices
By Prophet in forum The ClubhouseReplies: 2Last Post: 01-26-2007, 04:59 PM -
what city rates the highest in the nation
By casper in forum The ClubhouseReplies: 22Last Post: 08-09-2004, 05:48 PM



Reply With Quote



Bookmarks