Thread: Does the draft help McKinnie?

[size=13pt]Does the draft help McKinnie?[/size]

Posted by Sean Jensen on April 27, 2008 5:18 PM
twincities.com


No matter how you dice it, the Vikings probably could not have addressed the offensive tackle position high in the NFL Draft....

And we still see yutz's say that it is the Chillers decision when more reputable papers say its Wilf who needs to be convinced to keep him.

Amazing.
:

"Marrdro" wrote:

And we still see yutz's say that it is the Chillers decision when more reputable papers say its Wilf who needs to be convinced to keep him.

Amazing.
:

Yet you love those local rags when they agree with you.


When they coincide with your sentiment: Great article! Great read!

When they differ from your opinion: Yutz's


By the way, weren't they the ones that dispelled the "trade upgrade" that your boy Tim Yotter profesed, yet you stood by Yotter?

How did that turn out again? :P

Our FO will wait for the court date in June to proceed with their judgement. I believe it will be reduced in court, or even dismissed, and the league may not step in at all.

The draft did nothing for or against Mac. Anything that happens to him will be because of his own actions on or off the field. There was no LT on the board who could have stepped in for him so there was no reason to try to reach with a pick and be disappointed.

"singersp" wrote:

"Marrdro" wrote:

And we still see yutz's say that it is the Chillers decision when more reputable papers say its Wilf who needs to be convinced to keep him.

Amazing.

:

Yet you love those local rags when they agree with you.


When they coincide with your sentiment: Great article! Great read!

When they differ from your opinion: Yutz's


By the way, weren't they the ones that dispelled the "trade upgrade" that your boy Tim Yotter profesed, yet you stood by Yotter?

How did that turn out again? :P

Ahhhh, a typical newshound.
Sticking up for the local yutz's.

If memory serves we did sweeten the pot though didn't we?
Was he really that far off?
Hell the local papers didn't even know this thing was happening.
:P

"UffDaVikes" wrote:

The draft did nothing for or against Mac. Anything that happens to him will be because of his own actions on or off the field. There was no LT on the board who could have stepped in for him so there was no reason to try to reach with a pick and be disappointed.

Like the new avatar by the way.
;D

"Marrdro" wrote:

"singersp" wrote:

"Marrdro" wrote:

And we still see yutz's say that it is the Chillers decision when more reputable papers say its Wilf who needs to be convinced to keep him.

Amazing.
:

Yet you love those local rags when they agree with you.


When they coincide with your sentiment: Great article! Great read!

When they differ from your opinion: Yutz's


By the way, weren't they the ones that dispelled the "trade upgrade" that your boy Tim Yotter profesed, yet you stood by Yotter?

How did that turn out again? :P

Ahhhh, a typical newshound.
Sticking up for the local yutz's.

If memory serves we did sweeten the pot though didn't we?
Was he really that far off?
Hell the local papers didn't even know this thing was happening.
:P

I take all articles at face value. They are human beings just as we are & their opinions are no better or no worse than ours are. Paid subscription or not.

Go back & check your Vikings Update magazines again. Even they changed their tunes after they discovered the local rags & other media outlets were correct in their dispelling of scout.com's reports.

no trading Bmac, its stupid if it happens

"Marrdro" wrote:

And we still see yutz's say that it is the Chillers decision when more reputable papers say its Wilf who needs to be convinced to keep him.

Amazing.
:

I won't say that but I will say we should of drafted Carl Nicks in the 5th round.