Thread: Do we need Randy to beat the Titans?

I do not think that we need Randy to play if his injury is still in question come game time. Look back at the Saints game. We scored 21 points in the first half when we recieved the ball. Then in the second half we scored 17 points, and we kicked the ball off. If we could have just pushed the FG drive a little more then we would have had 21 points in the half with Randy and the ball, and 21 without randy and without the ball in the other half. I know i worded that really weird, but I honestly do not think we need him if he wants to sit out vs the Titans. (but I do want him to play, lol)

I don't think we need him...sure helps the odds overall.

No, I don't think they do. That's why we have the deepest bench in the league! :salute:

No, I think Robinson and Burleson can pick up the slack.
Maybe the Vikes could line up Bennett in the slot and use him as a third reciever, since Moore is starting again htis week

I think we should let Moss heal for this game, that way he'll have 2 weeks to get ready to embarrass the crap outa the G-string Boyz :lol:
Plus we may get to see our home grown Ryan Hoag suitup and actually get in the game to contribute this week. :cheers:

Mike Tice already gave a very definate no when asked if they would use Michael Bennett possibly as a third receiver so I would doubt that would happen.

Is bennett cleared to play?

"Kleinsasser40" wrote:

Is bennett cleared to play?

yeah wont start but will play

I'd rather see a two back set with Michael and Mewelde in the backfield with twin wideouts, then we can have Mewelde come out of the backfield to catch balls. I would rather have Randy in the game! I just love to watch him play.

how could we not need the best reciever in the league???? He opens up the passing and running game. The only reason the vikes did well against the saints after randy left the game was because the saints D sucks.