Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 54 of 54
  1. #51
    V-Unit's Avatar
    V-Unit is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,317

    Re: Ditka/Parcells on Vikes and Childress

    []
    "I hate when threads are destroyed by facts and logic."
    - Prophet


    Thanks Josdin!

  2. #52
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,916

    Re: Ditka/Parcells on Vikes and Childress

    []
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  3. #53
    V-Unit's Avatar
    V-Unit is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,317

    Re: Ditka/Parcells on Vikes and Childress

    "Marrdro" wrote:
    "V" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    "V" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    [quote author=VikingMike link=topic=39037.msg660417#msg660417 date=1193154491]

    Singersp, you would know better than I...is Childress's playbook so voluminous that it is difficult to grasp?
    I wouldn't know, I have not seen it & the gol 'darnit ball boy has been unreliable this year.

    But rumor has it this is the playbook..........

    Looks old and outdated, just like our offensive scheme!
    But you would rather have them go to a run on every down scheme that came from the ancient past, long before the WCO, or the forward pass for that matter,
    was ever concieved.

    ;D
    I never said that, I said 60/40, which is actually something we agree on.

    What I would rather have is a scheme that is molded around the players running it. You know, kind of like what the Patriots, Jets, Steelers, Titans, Panthers, Colts, Bengals, Giants, Bills, Jaguars, Redskins, and Saints run.

    Getting players to fit into a certain scheme is what they did in the 1960s. These days, coaches build their schemes around the unique talent they have.
    I know my friend.
    Just cycling you a bit.
    I do like to try to use my sense of humor once in a while.

    I thought they tried pretty good with overall scheme and players tonight.

    How did you like how BB came in hot off the bench.
    HUH HUH HUH

    ;D
    [/quote]

    You win this round. Playcalling was good. Execution was miserable.

    3/12 on 3rd downs.
    "I hate when threads are destroyed by facts and logic."
    - Prophet


    Thanks Josdin!

  4. #54
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,916

    Re: Ditka/Parcells on Vikes and Childress

    "V" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    "V" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    "V" wrote:
    [quote author=singersp link=topic=39037.msg662111#msg662111 date=1193396317]
    [quote author=VikingMike link=topic=39037.msg660417#msg660417 date=1193154491]

    Singersp, you would know better than I...is Childress's playbook so voluminous that it is difficult to grasp?
    I wouldn't know, I have not seen it & the gol 'darnit ball boy has been unreliable this year.

    But rumor has it this is the playbook..........

    Looks old and outdated, just like our offensive scheme!
    But you would rather have them go to a run on every down scheme that came from the ancient past, long before the WCO, or the forward pass for that matter,
    was ever concieved.

    ;D
    I never said that, I said 60/40, which is actually something we agree on.

    What I would rather have is a scheme that is molded around the players running it. You know, kind of like what the Patriots, Jets, Steelers, Titans, Panthers, Colts, Bengals, Giants, Bills, Jaguars, Redskins, and Saints run.

    Getting players to fit into a certain scheme is what they did in the 1960s. These days, coaches build their schemes around the unique talent they have.
    I know my friend.
    Just cycling you a bit.
    I do like to try to use my sense of humor once in a while.

    I thought they tried pretty good with overall scheme and players tonight.

    How did you like how BB came in hot off the bench.
    HUH HUH HUH

    ;D
    [/quote]

    You win this round. Playcalling was good. Execution was miserable.

    3/12 on 3rd downs.
    [/quote]
    If everything worked out to perfection you and I would be bored.
    ;D
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Similar Threads

  1. Mike Ditka still a vikings hater
    By oaklandzoo24 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 11-19-2008, 10:00 PM
  2. Ditka blasts former bosses
    By singersp in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-20-2007, 01:18 PM
  3. Childress rights Vikes' ship
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-11-2006, 01:23 AM
  4. Get down with Ditka
    By enlvikeman in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-15-2005, 09:19 PM
  5. DITKA AND JOHNSON MENTIONED
    By TMAC604 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-04-2005, 06:09 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •