I remember that thread. I said it there and I will say it again, a turnover is not merely a change of posession, it is not guaged by what the immediate result is.
I went back through my posts and couldn't find it amongst the 700 or so post that it could have been in.
Short version of what I wrote is this. DC had a few fumbles and a few INTs that really counted. The rest was all in garbage time. If you go back and look at the play by play of the games(actually look at the Bengals game and that sums it up, it just all gets put on DC shoulders as the QB), you will see what I am talking about. Yes, DC did have TOs, but most of them were a team effort or in garbage time when HE was trying to hard to get us back into games that were out of reach.
In addition to what Linehan said, I think that the team didn't help DC. Tipped balls, bad line play, and the D let some big plays go, so we had to play from behind. We were playing from behind in most all the losses we had in the 2-5 start.