Thread: crowell? more like CRACKwell!
-
02-28-2003, 05:18 AM #1
crowell? more like CRACKwell!
Hupo oe ke kau ana i ka waiupa a ma kou pa o & Hupo na Po o waiupa a

-
03-01-2003, 02:07 AM #2
crowell? more like CRACKwell!
-
03-03-2003, 02:22 AM #3
Rookie
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 50
crowell? more like CRACKwell!

-
03-03-2003, 02:40 AM #4
crowell? more like CRACKwell!
A packer fan aint worth the lead.
-
03-03-2003, 03:03 AM #5
Starter
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 220
crowell? more like CRACKwell!
-
03-03-2003, 03:03 AM #6
Rookie
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 50
crowell? more like CRACKwell!
my apologies to david spade for ripping off an old hollywood minute joke (chaplin? more like CRAPlin!) but does anyone really think that germane crowell will be a better #2 receiver for the vikings than d'wayne bates or kelly campbell? i certainly don't think so. he was lackluster last year for the lions and i don't think he's any kind of upgrade to the current vikes receiver corps. my 2¢ on WR is stick with what you have, maybe try a young guy from a late round of the draft or rookie free agent like campbell, but certainly DON'T spend money better used on areas that really need an upgrade like d-line, d-back and o-line (corbin lacina just isn't an every down lineman anymore.) when you had the #2 offense in the league (yardage-wise) i say if it ain't broke, don't fix it. correct the turnovers (which o-line help would help do), bolster the defense, and this is a VERY good playoff caliber team. DO NOT, DO NOT, DO NOT pay big money for germane crowell.





Reply With Quote




Bookmarks