Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    hawaiianvike21 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,412

    crowell? more like CRACKwell!

    Hupo oe ke kau ana i ka waiupa a ma kou pa o & Hupo na Po o waiupa a


  2. #2
    nzviking is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    825

    crowell? more like CRACKwell!


  3. #3
    thinsafetypin is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    50

    crowell? more like CRACKwell!


  4. #4
    SkolVikes's Avatar
    SkolVikes is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    76

    crowell? more like CRACKwell!

    A packer fan aint worth the lead.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    220

    crowell? more like CRACKwell!


  6. #6
    thinsafetypin is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    50

    crowell? more like CRACKwell!

    my apologies to david spade for ripping off an old hollywood minute joke (chaplin? more like CRAPlin!) but does anyone really think that germane crowell will be a better #2 receiver for the vikings than d'wayne bates or kelly campbell? i certainly don't think so. he was lackluster last year for the lions and i don't think he's any kind of upgrade to the current vikes receiver corps. my 2¢ on WR is stick with what you have, maybe try a young guy from a late round of the draft or rookie free agent like campbell, but certainly DON'T spend money better used on areas that really need an upgrade like d-line, d-back and o-line (corbin lacina just isn't an every down lineman anymore.) when you had the #2 offense in the league (yardage-wise) i say if it ain't broke, don't fix it. correct the turnovers (which o-line help would help do), bolster the defense, and this is a VERY good playoff caliber team. DO NOT, DO NOT, DO NOT pay big money for germane crowell.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •