im kinda curious.... what if reggie became owner before march 2nd somehow and since he loves moss decided to cancel the trade.... is this possible or is this set in stone???
Printable View
im kinda curious.... what if reggie became owner before march 2nd somehow and since he loves moss decided to cancel the trade.... is this possible or is this set in stone???
It's not possible, and Moss is gonna be playing for the silver and black next season. It's time to move on.
yeah no crap u see my pics of napoleon harris... i was just curious
Fowler will not own the Vikes before March 2....and I dont think he will own them at all, and my gut feeling is Red feels the same way
da m n i hate red mcombs
http://www.purpledawgs.com/dumbfuckred3.jpg
Brilliant, I'd like a shirt like that.
"NDVikingFan66" wrote:
i'm begining to think the same thing. i don't think fowler is getting the vikes. there's just no way red would make a move like this without fowler's consent (which it appears he does not have). he's a sheisster, that's for sure, but not even red would make a move this big on his own if he still planned to sell. i think fowler's going to be out of the picture soon, a la Tom Clancy.Quote:
Fowler will not own the Vikes before March 2....and I dont think he will own them at all, and my gut feeling is Red feels the same way
save us glen!!!
To answer the question, Yes, if fowler did recieve the team by the 2nd then he would have the power to cancel the trade. He can do this because...AHEM...nothing has been signed, as I have been saying for the past week.
But again....it is impossible for him to own them by them. The NFL timeline doesnt support it
Fowler will not cancel the trade - he is the one who wanted it. He will make it sound like he didnt know about it, he disapproves of it, etc. because he wants to come in on a good note. We will probably be active in FA if it is up to him because he has to owe the fans something.