Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Cheap Shot?

  1. #1
    bmc342's Avatar
    bmc342 is offline Waterboy
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    12

    Cheap Shot?

    Wilf testified in front of the joint Senate/House committee Monday and withdrew the Vikings request for $115 million for a retractable roof. He did this despite the fact that Anoka county officials have made it clear they want a roof. Despite the cost saving, does anyone else see this as a cheap shot by Wilf? The Vikings made a deal with Anoka county and then changed it without even conferring with them. Good luck dealing with the Anoka county board next year if the stadium bill doesn't pass this year.

  2. #2
    mnjamie's Avatar
    mnjamie is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,536

    Re: Cheap Shot?

    "bmc342" wrote:
    Wilf testified in front of the joint Senate/House committee Monday and withdrew the Vikings request for $115 million for a retractable roof. He did this despite the fact that Anoka county officials have made it clear they want a roof. Despite the cost saving, does anyone else see this as a cheap shot by Wilf? The Vikings made a deal with Anoka county and then changed it without even conferring with them. Good luck dealing with the Anoka county board next year if the stadium bill doesn't pass this year.

    Link Please???


    If this is true, I can see Anoka county withdrawing their offer completely. IMO I don't see the Vikes getting their stadium this legislative session and now if Wilfi "cut of his nose to spite his face" .... this deal is done for a long time.

  3. #3
    shockzilla's Avatar
    shockzilla is offline PPO Ambassador
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    6,204
    Blog Entries
    29

    Re: Cheap Shot?

    I don't see it as a cheap shot - I think he's trying to help get the deal passed by shrinking the cost of the deal.
    PPO Ambassador, Defender of the Purple Faith and Guardian of the Gates of Valhalla

  4. #4
    BadlandsVikings's Avatar
    BadlandsVikings is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    26,572

    Re: Cheap Shot?

    He wants something to get done, it' not cheap at all. To me it means he will to do anything to keep the team in Minnesota.

  5. #5
    mblack76's Avatar
    mblack76 is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    412

    Re: Cheap Shot?

    "shockzilla" wrote:
    I don't see it as a cheap shot - I think he's trying to help get the deal passed by shrinking the cost of the deal.
    I agree. However this should not be done at the expense of both sides negotiation or talking things over before him going public. I hope they did anyways!

  6. #6
    mnjamie's Avatar
    mnjamie is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,536

    Re: Cheap Shot?

    "shockzilla" wrote:
    I don't see it as a cheap shot - I think he's trying to help get the deal passed by shrinking the cost of the deal.

    Anoka County, his "partner" in this venture has already numerous times stated they want a roof on the stadium (retracable or not) for it to be finacially viable for them. If Wilfi made this decision without their consent, it can only mean troubled waters between the two.

    But again, Still Waiting On A Link to confirm that this even happened though. :roll:

  7. #7
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Re: Cheap Shot?

    "bmc342" wrote:
    Wilf testified in front of the joint Senate/House committee Monday and withdrew the Vikings request for $115 million for a retractable roof. He did this despite the fact that Anoka county officials have made it clear they want a roof. Despite the cost saving, does anyone else see this as a cheap shot by Wilf? The Vikings made a deal with Anoka county and then changed it without even conferring with them. Good luck dealing with the Anoka county board next year if the stadium bill doesn't pass this year.
    Then let Anoka County pay for the cost of the roof...the FIXED roof...and then Wilf AND Anoka County can split the cost of the difference between the fixed roof and the retractable roof...that way everyone pays for what they want...and splits the cost of the compromise item (the retractable roof).

    As for me, that is why my car has a retractable roof...I want a convertible, my wife wants a hardtop...the retractable roof is the compromise...of course, I pay for the whole thing...but that's a whole 'nother issue! :lol:
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

  8. #8
    NeumDog's Avatar
    NeumDog is offline Tailgate Bitch
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Stillwater, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    340

    Re: Cheap Shot?

    http://www.startribune.com/510/story/435648.html

    Here's the link to the article in the StarTribune.

    This thing was never going to get done this year anyway. I have my doubts about any of them.

  9. #9
    nephilimstorm's Avatar
    nephilimstorm is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,184

    Re: Cheap Shot?

    Notes and Transactions

    Notes

    May 15 Brian Bakst, of the Associated Press, reports Minnesota Vikings vice president Lester Bagley told legislative negotiators dealing with stadium proposals that the team is willing to forego a retractable roof to shave costs and eliminate the need for $115 million in state subsidies. Bagley said it would reduce the price by $560 million, but another $115 million is being sought after by the team and Anoka County to improve the roads to complement the Blaine facility. Team owner Zygi Wilf would insist on no roof over a fixed roof, according to Bagley. With a retractable roof, the team would likely keep the top open on many game days. He added 70 percent of the seats would be covered by some type of overhang and there would be other heating to keep fans warm. Anoka County leaders are insisting the stadium include either a fixed or retractable roof to attract other event like the Super Bowl, the NCAA Basketball Final Four or concerts.

    http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/min/notes;_ylt=Ahq2UP1odZLWSuuSRICPTNpDubYF

  10. #10
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Re: Cheap Shot?

    Note to legislature:

    1. Remove head from rear end
    2. Clean out crap from ears
    3. Listen to the taxpayers
    4. Pass the stadium deal
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Ray Lewis calls out Brady Quinn for 'cheap shot'
    By Marrdro in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 11-18-2009, 02:50 PM
  2. Replies: 62
    Last Post: 11-11-2008, 07:34 AM
  3. Fox sports says Hasselbeck's injury a "Cheap Shot" by EJ
    By Slade in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 98
    Last Post: 10-25-2006, 10:28 AM
  4. Red is cheap!
    By HarrisonB57 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-04-2005, 12:31 AM
  5. Cheap Shot Patriots
    By snowinapril in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-23-2004, 09:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •