Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 39
  1. #21
    vikingbill50's Avatar
    vikingbill50 is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    271

    Re: Is change good for the Vikings?

    dont know why you feel you come to this site to vent..but guess its your choice
    I BLEED THE COLOR PURPLE

  2. #22
    Prophet Guest

    Re: Is change good for the Vikings?

    Benedict Arnold.
    For those of you who don't know why he is going ballistic...it's because he earned his new title by bad mouthing PP.O at another site and now feels slighted because he earned a title.
    Poor boognish.
    Most people would have laughed, he has a personal vendetta against the site now.

    What a loser.

  3. #23
    OchoCinco's Avatar
    OchoCinco is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    770

    Re: Is change good for the Vikings?

    Why was he badmouthing us?? What did we do?

  4. #24
    vikingbill50's Avatar
    vikingbill50 is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    271

    Re: Is change good for the Vikings?

    think its time for him to grow up..very childish
    I BLEED THE COLOR PURPLE

  5. #25
    whackthepack is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,535

    Re: Is change good for the Vikings?

    "Prophet" wrote:
    "boognish" wrote:
    ...Yep, not bad. Now I can, with good conscience, save the football talk for the other 2 sites I'm a member of and use this one to vent and call out the douchebags that frequent it...although it may be hard to quit football talk cold turkey.
    Good luck with that.
    You're more mentally challenged than I originally thought.


    Boognish you are one of the few douchebags on the site so you shouldn't treat your brethren like that!
    What we've got here is failure to communicate.

  6. #26
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,218

    Re: Is change good for the Vikings?

    "whackthepack" wrote:
    "Prophet" wrote:
    "boognish" wrote:
    ...Yep, not bad. Now I can, with good conscience, save the football talk for the other 2 sites I'm a member of and use this one to vent and call out the douchebags that frequent it...although it may be hard to quit football talk cold turkey.
    Good luck with that.
    You're more mentally challenged than I originally thought.

    Boognish you are one of the few douchebags on the site so you shouldn't treat your brethren like that!
    No he's not............. He's not here anymore!
    ;D

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  7. #27
    Vikes_King's Avatar
    Vikes_King is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    7,104

    Re: Is change good for the Vikings?

    guys, quit badmouthing boognish

    i want him to stay, this is entertaining


    http://vikesking.blogspot.com/

    "We’ll win our own Super Bowl, with our own players. Real Vikings. Something Brett Favre can never be."

    - Dan Calabrese

  8. #28
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,218

    Re: Is change good for the Vikings?

    "Vikes_King" wrote:
    guys, quit badmouthing boognish

    i want him to stay, this is entertaining
    It's too late for him. He was banned yesterday. Here is the pic he posted of himself in the mempers pics thread

    [img width=400 height=393]http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b21/singersp82759/ugly.jpg[/img]

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  9. #29
    Big C is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    828

    Re: Is change good for the Vikings?

    My biggest concern is Childress's afinity to ex-Phillly players. I don't know why McMullen is still on the team but I hope he can prove me wrong. No objections to keeping him on the 53 man roster. But Todd Pinkston?! The dude is injured, hardly played in eagles camp and we sign this dude to a 1 year deal?! At the cost of Carter moving to practice squad? Give me a break.

    I am hoping that we will sign Quincy Morgan this week and get rid of Pinkston. At least Morgan is healthy.
    Halo 4. Start another fight.

  10. #30
    Vikes's Avatar
    Vikes is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,733

    Re: Is change good for the Vikings?

    "Big" wrote:
    My biggest concern is Childress's afinity to ex-Phillly players. I don't know why McMullen is still on the team but I hope he can prove me wrong. No objections to keeping him on the 53 man roster. But Todd Pinkston?! The dude is injured, hardly played in eagles camp and we sign this dude to a 1 year deal?! At the cost of Carter moving to practice squad? Give me a break.

    I am hoping that we will sign Quincy Morgan this week and get rid of Pinkston. At least Morgan is healthy.
    I agree 100% this love fest with ex-Philly players is getting old. Also I would take Quincy Morgan over TPinkston.
    300

    The rigors of Spartan life. Leonidas is cast out into the wild, and survives the harsh winter to return to his home, when he is crowned King ....a Viking!

    300

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Change isn't in wind for Vikings
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-21-2006, 01:46 PM
  2. Striking change in these Vikings
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-29-2006, 07:00 AM
  3. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 03-15-2006, 01:57 AM
  4. A good start at a change would be to .............
    By carolinafan in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-22-2005, 05:13 AM
  5. this change has been good, but...
    By PAvikesfan in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-13-2005, 06:38 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •