Thread: Carolina vs. Minnesota post-game
I was calling for a new GM and a 3-4 defense a few years ago but was told that would never work.
I was also calling for a coach that would install a vertical passing attack with AP lined up 8 yards deep instead of the WCO. Any takers on that now?
10-15-2013, 12:46 PM #72Trying out some new forums since I got my ip banned on Purple Chat 2 weeks ago...
10-15-2013, 12:58 PM #73
I'm with Zeus. Both the 4-3 and WCO are outdated. Frazier is living in the past. We need to be getting the ball to Peterson in space. Can he not catch a pass?
10-15-2013, 01:35 PM #74Trying out some new forums since I got my ip banned on Purple Chat 2 weeks ago...
10-15-2013, 01:43 PM #75
I have to admit that since I formed that take I have actually changed my mind a bit on the whole thing.
As far as the defense goes, I was listening to Ray Lewis talk about the playoffs last year when they played the bronco's and he said that he went back and watched all of the playoff games that Manning played in and what he found was that every team that beat him used a zone defense to do it. He went on to say that Manning is so good at reading defenses that every time he faced a team playing man coverage he beat them because he knew exactly where to go with the ball but the teams that ran the zone successfully were able to disguise the coverage's and that caused him to make mistakes or be less effective and that is what Baltimore used to beat denver in the playoffs last year.
Now, I understand that Manning beats zone defenses regularly too but it does give an indication that the zone defense is valid if you have the right coaching and the right talent. But you need speed and smart players and i don't think we have done a good job at supplying those things. Plus the 3-4 is really more effective at stopping the run and since this is a passing league that seems to be less than ideal the majority of the time. That being said either a 4-3 or a 3-4 can be a great defense if you get the right personnel and have the right coaches.
Then there is the WCO.
Denver, New England, Green Bay, Seattle and San fran all run a WCO and they are among the top offenses in the league year over year. You can still have a WCO and have a great team if you have the right coaching and the right personnel to run it.
That gets back to we need better coaches ad we need to do a job of putting the players in situations they can excel in.
And we need a franchise QB.
Everything else is pretty much window dressing.
10-15-2013, 03:23 PM #77
Remember when we drafted Moss? He was in the game plan from day one. This coaching staff does not believe in doing things like that, but instead they want to slowly bring the rookies in due to...actually, I don't know why.
-Patterson should have been our star WR on day one, but instead he was relegated to kick off returns.
-Floyd should have been put into our starting D, and allowed to make the mistakes he needed to make so that by this time, he was becoming a force to be dealt with.
-Rhodes seems like the only rookie we have played with regularity, and he is the one that seemed to need more time. Go figure.
In the end, it isn't the person who drafted these guy's fault that they have not been used effectively. We need a coach with his own staff to make the Vikings legitimate again. Something tells me that a team with AD, Patterson and Greg Jennings, not to mention all the other up-and-comers should draw a coach who is licking his chomps to succeed with those players.Men are moved by two levers only: fear and self interest.
10-15-2013, 03:26 PM #78
BTW, I AM an optimist, and it is hard not to look at the Vikings and feel like there is a future with our team.
That sunnyside disposition ends there; until we remove the front office people who are not helping, we will continue to under perform.Men are moved by two levers only: fear and self interest.
As long as we have the owners we have we will continue to get the same types of coaches they have already given us.
10-15-2013, 09:00 PM #80Coordinator
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
It doesn't matter what scheme you run if you have a GM in synch. with the coaches, who know how to get the most out of their players. That is the successful formula, GM gets the players the coaches need to make their schemes work. That is why giving the GM the power to hire and fire coaches works.
And the owners have to let the GM do his job.
Sounds simple, but this is the formula for success.
A GM is a guy who knows football. An owner is a guy who knows how to make money.
Owner medaling is a formula for failure, as evidenced in Dallas, Redskins, and the latter years of Al Davis.