Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32
  1. #11
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,899

    Re: Camarillo hasn't caught on yet

    12purplepride28 wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    12purplepride28 wrote:
    GC: I've been through a lot of offenses. It's just a matter of getting the right terminology. It took a few days to figure that out, but I'm up to speed. I've got things rolling.
    Idk what the article's title is for. According to Cam he HAS caught on.
    If he is up to speed and we definately need someone who can catch the ball out there, then what pray tell is your assesment of why he isn't more involved?

    For the life of me, I can only think of one reason he hasn't been used and none of you guys want to hear it, thats for sure. :lol: :lol: :lol:
    I know some of the blame goes to Favre, but not all of it. I don't think Childress knows how to utilize the talent we have on this team properly.
    I haven't been on the Noodles case this week. I've been on the WR corps as a whole.

    Our issue is related to not having a big possesiion kindof guy. Without him, the others will get more attention from the defenses because a they don't have to worry about defending that aspect of the scheme.

    On a side note, not everything I say/do on here is focused on the Noodle. I leave that to Mars.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  2. #12
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,899

    Re: Camarillo hasn't caught on yet

    Zeus wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    Zeus wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    12purplepride28 wrote:
    GC: I've been through a lot of offenses. It's just a matter of getting the right terminology. It took a few days to figure that out, but I'm up to speed. I've got things rolling.
    Idk what the article's title is for. According to Cam he HAS caught on.
    If he is up to speed and we definately need someone who can catch the ball out there, then what pray tell is your assesment of why he isn't more involved?
    He was on the field a lot on Sunday, playing on the right side in 2-WR sets. And that's why he isn't involved - because he has never been an outside WR in the NFL. He's a slot guy. And you, of all people, should know that it's not as simple as "You line up here and run this pattern".
    You cut out the part were I said "I have an opinion but you guys don't want to hear it".

    What do you think my opinion is? Probably the same one I've said over and over and over all week.
    I ignore a lot of your posts because they inevitably end up being some snide "Noodle" comment and I'm just tired of it. What's your opinion, then?

    =Z=
    Nope, in this instance its more along the lines of people getting tired of me sticking up for BB.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  3. #13
    ThorSPL's Avatar
    ThorSPL is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    3,422

    Re: Camarillo hasn't caught on yet

    He has supposedly caught on...
    He just hasn't caught much!


    Trust me, I'm a doctor.

    www.twitter.com/ThorSPL

  4. #14
    V-Unit's Avatar
    V-Unit is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,317

    Re: Camarillo hasn't caught on yet

    Zeus wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    Zeus wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    12purplepride28 wrote:
    GC: I've been through a lot of offenses. It's just a matter of getting the right terminology. It took a few days to figure that out, but I'm up to speed. I've got things rolling.
    Idk what the article's title is for. According to Cam he HAS caught on.
    If he is up to speed and we definately need someone who can catch the ball out there, then what pray tell is your assesment of why he isn't more involved?
    He was on the field a lot on Sunday, playing on the right side in 2-WR sets. And that's why he isn't involved - because he has never been an outside WR in the NFL. He's a slot guy. And you, of all people, should know that it's not as simple as "You line up here and run this pattern".
    You cut out the part were I said "I have an opinion but you guys don't want to hear it".

    What do you think my opinion is? Probably the same one I've said over and over and over all week.
    I ignore a lot of your posts because they inevitably end up being some snide "Noodle" comment and I'm just tired of it. What's your opinion, then?

    =Z=
    I KNEW we had something in common. Besides the signature line that I stole from you, of course.

    -V-
    "I hate when threads are destroyed by facts and logic."
    - Prophet


    Thanks Josdin!

  5. #15
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Camarillo hasn't caught on yet

    Camarro will be just fine. I have him slated for 11 catches for 105 yards against Detroit.

    Put him in the slot and find a different job for Harvin.

  6. #16
    Infidel is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,947

    Re: Camarillo hasn't caught on yet

    Harvin will probably have a headache anyway.....clear sailing.
    It's what you learn after you know it all that counts.
    --John Wooden

  7. #17
    marstc09's Avatar
    marstc09 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    23,179

    Re: Camarillo hasn't caught on yet

    Marrdro wrote:
    Zeus wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    Zeus wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    12purplepride28 wrote:
    GC: I've been through a lot of offenses. It's just a matter of getting the right terminology. It took a few days to figure that out, but I'm up to speed. I've got things rolling.
    Idk what the article's title is for. According to Cam he HAS caught on.
    If he is up to speed and we definately need someone who can catch the ball out there, then what pray tell is your assesment of why he isn't more involved?
    He was on the field a lot on Sunday, playing on the right side in 2-WR sets. And that's why he isn't involved - because he has never been an outside WR in the NFL. He's a slot guy. And you, of all people, should know that it's not as simple as "You line up here and run this pattern".
    You cut out the part were I said "I have an opinion but you guys don't want to hear it".

    What do you think my opinion is? Probably the same one I've said over and over and over all week.
    I ignore a lot of your posts because they inevitably end up being some snide "Noodle" comment and I'm just tired of it. What's your opinion, then?

    =Z=
    Nope, in this instance its more along the lines of people getting tired of me sticking up for BB.
    You always stick up for the shit players. It is a theme.

  8. #18
    Infidel is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,947

    Re: Camarillo hasn't caught on yet

    I think people should back off on all the BB bashing for a while. Give the guy a chance.

    How many of us can relate to the tragedy of life as an NFL Millionaire dragged down by a chronic hangnail?

    Let's give him some time.
    It's what you learn after you know it all that counts.
    --John Wooden

  9. #19
    Prophet's Avatar
    Prophet is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    17,388

    Re: Camarillo hasn't caught on yet

    Infidel wrote:
    I think people should back off on all the BB bashing for a while. Give the guy a chance.

    How many of us can relate to the tragedy of life as an NFL Millionaire dragged down by a chronic hangnail?

    Let's give him some time.
    No doubt. McKinnie stood him up at the joy hole last night too. The poor guy needs support, not a constant ribbing.
    Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain

  10. #20
    Holzberg is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    57

    Re: Camarillo hasn't caught on yet

    Infidel wrote:
    I think people should back off on all the BB bashing for a while. Give the guy a chance.

    How many of us can relate to the tragedy of life as an NFL Millionaire dragged down by a chronic hangnail?

    Let's give him some time.
    How many chances does the guy need? He had 1 good game last year. Are we suppose to wait for his 1 good game this year and say WOW! That guy is awesome! Sign him for another 5 years!

    Hell No! Trade him!

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Vikings trade for Greg Camarillo?
    By VikingMike in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 101
    Last Post: 09-16-2010, 02:38 PM
  2. Caught at 100 mph -- now what?
    By BadlandsVikings in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-08-2009, 12:02 AM
  3. THEY CAUGHT ET!!!!
    By jmcdon00 in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-11-2008, 08:49 AM
  4. Caught having sex.
    By Twinkings83 in forum Post Wasteland
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-21-2006, 08:46 AM
  5. I cant believe he caught this
    By vikings_fan66 in forum Trash the Pack
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-10-2004, 11:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •