Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 97
  1. #21
    The Dropper's Avatar
    The Dropper is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Portland, Ore.
    Posts
    2,101

    Re: Brooks Bollinger joins the Vikes (Merged Threads)

    Whoa...
    That guy graduated the same year i did at my hometown's other high school. We hadquite a few mutual friends. I kinda followed his career w/ the Jets (hometown pride and all). Mosley will be missed, but it's cool having another Nodak boy on the team!

  2. #22
    Torontovik15 is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    51

    Re: Brooks Bollinger joins the Vikes (Merged Threads)

    You cant really say Bollinger plays like a 4th string QB, since he had played most of last year as the backup to pennington.
    He is a second string and at worse 3rd, the Jets have2 good QBs and a rookie... Of course he was expandable and that is good for us...Hopefully he doesnt have to play a down for us, but I like the insurance policy...How much to we pay for our insurance, alot...So it cost the viking more then we wanted, it will all work out in the end...
    What we got here is a failure to communicate.

  3. #23
    Mikecarter81's Avatar
    Mikecarter81 is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    823

    Re: Brooks Bollinger joins the Vikes (Merged Threads)

    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    Great, a 'Skani.

    Oh well, hopefully he can manage a clipboard and here is to hoping he isn't needed
    Hey he'll be fine, if memory serves me right.
    Childress thought he was a good talent when he was an assistant.
    He isn't a superstar, but a good quality back up, with the right teaching he could be another Brad Johnson, much better then McMahon or O sullivan

    Mike
    I am an avid Viking fan, but also am an avid restoration guy of vintage Mopar(Chrysler, Dodge, Plymouth)B bodies

  4. #24
    MensaTice's Avatar
    MensaTice is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,799

    Re: Brooks Bollinger joins the Vikes (Merged Threads)

    As the lone Mosely hater on the board let me be the first to say good riddance.
    As Fuad pointed out, he is basically wasting a roster spot.
    Bollinger can't be any worse than McMahon.
    Great move.

    [color=red]

  5. #25
    whackthepack is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,535

    Re: Brooks Bollinger joins the Vikes (Merged Threads)

    I think that a few years down the road we will regret trading away Mosley but it didn't look like he was going to make the team and we get a QB that is better than McWoman or TJ O'Dullison for somebody that was going to be cut.
    What we've got here is failure to communicate.

  6. #26
    whackthepack is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,535

    Re: Brooks Bollinger joins the Vikes (Merged Threads)

    "LuckyVike" wrote:
    "FuadFan" wrote:
    I guess it is a good trade since Mosely wouldn't make our team. I know he was forced into action last year when Pennington went down did anybody here watch how he did?
    Are you serious man?
    Mosley was going to be a solid back up d-lineman for us.
    I think this is an idiotic trade.
    Too big of a deal has been made of us getting a back up QB.
    For God sake, can the Jets 4TH string QB really be that much better than Tarvaris?

    I am very bummed that we traded Mosley but I agree with the other people that are
    saying Mosley was not going to make the team, it was pretty much known that he was going to be cut.
    I think we will regret it years down the road but at least we got something for nothing as he was going to be cut.
    What we've got here is failure to communicate.

  7. #27
    Ltrey33 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,618

    Re: Brooks Bollinger joins the Vikes (Merged Threads)

    "whackthepack" wrote:
    I think that a few years down the road we will regret trading away Mosley but it didn't look like he was going to make the team and we get a QB that is better than McWoman or TJ O'Dullison for somebody that was going to be cut.
    I don't think "in a few years" really matters right now to Childress, especially with a guy like Mosley. I think when you weigh it all out, Mosley is worth the price of a dependable backup.

  8. #28
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,212

    Re: Brooks Bollinger joins the Vikes (Merged Threads)

    I said in another thread a few days back that both McMahon & O'Sullivan will be gone by next week.

    No crow to eat here.

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  9. #29
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,212

    Re: Brooks Bollinger joins the Vikes (Merged Threads)

    There is another thread discussing this topic that was started a half hour earlier than this one.

    The two should be merged.

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  10. #30
    CCthebest's Avatar
    CCthebest is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,270

    Re: Brooks Bollinger joins the Vikes (Merged Threads)

    Typical Childress move....god help us all

Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. I am a better QB than Brooks Bollinger.
    By Prophet in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 09-02-2009, 06:08 PM
  2. One thing with QB Brooks Bollinger
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-23-2007, 06:30 AM
  3. Scout Radio: QB Brooks Bollinger
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-17-2007, 05:05 AM
  4. Rapid fire with Brooks Bollinger
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-04-2007, 06:23 PM
  5. Brooks Bollinger
    By Bretto in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-04-2006, 06:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •