Bob Sansevere article on benching Culpepper

**SWAYZE74** · 10-19-2005, 01:21 PM

no comments..just game stats...

Pep went 26-48, 237yds, completion% 54.2, 0 TDs, 2 INTs, with a QB rating of 50.4 against the bears...

peace...

**DaunteHOF** · 10-19-2005, 02:59 PM

blame it on the QB, pointing fingers now?

**mvikes84** · 10-20-2005, 03:50 AM

"DaunteHOF" wrote:

blame it on the QB, pointing fingers now?

He's supposed to be our leader. He even said he would be a "better QB without Randy Moss"!! His QB rating is the fourth WORST. They gave him more guaranteed money before the season started. Yes, the finger is being pointed DIRECTLY AT HIM!!!!

**FuadFan** · 10-20-2005, 03:54 AM

"mvikes84" wrote:

"DaunteHOF" wrote:

blame it on the QB, pointing fingers now?

He's supposed to be our leader. He even said he would be a "better QB without Randy Moss"!! His QB rating is the fourth WORST. They gave him more guaranteed money before the season started. Yes, the finger is being pointed DIRECTLY AT HIM!!!!

He is not a bad quarterback because we don't have Randy Moss but Randy Moss does not look like an elite WR without him and he can't stay healthy.

**viks_fan21** · 10-20-2005, 04:05 AM

let's just let Bob Sansevere wait until after the packers game. analysts need to stop jumping the gun on this kind of thing.

**LosAngelis** · 10-20-2005, 05:37 AM

Sorry, I didn't read through the whole thread, so sorry if this ends up looking out of place.

The one thing I saw with Culpepper was that fragile ego of his. Last week, I did not understand why they kept him in the game. The game was a blowout, you have this alleged effective backup, PUT HIM IN!

But Culpepper kept going in. Sure, there was a chance he could find his game, but chances were better he'd continue struggling and keep his confidence down.

I'm hoping he continues to struggle next week, so from my vantage point, I'm glad he kept struggling. From a logic standpoint, though, I'd put in a backup for Favre in the same situation.