Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 59

Thread: Bennett-wuh?!

  1. #11
    collegeguyjeff's Avatar
    collegeguyjeff is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,304

    Re: Bennett-wuh?!

    i think it's a shame sharper wasn't playing today cause smoot looked like a pro bowler out there today. when smoot plays that good with sharper i don't expect too many passes being caught
    I don t buy Wisconsin cheese.

  2. #12
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: Bennett-wuh?!

    CollegeJeff.. Our HS team just beat Cloquet!

  3. #13
    nephilimstorm's Avatar
    nephilimstorm is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,184

    Re: Bennett-wuh?!

    Ok, Bennett needs to go like I said in the shout...i also believe we can pick up in place of him a lineman that we need so much..the damn o-lne gave up six sacks...i do believe Michael is worth at least a 4th rounder not a or 6th...

  4. #14
    Mikecarter81's Avatar
    Mikecarter81 is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    823

    Re: Bennett-wuh?!

    Being a UW alumni I have always thought it was cool that two UW players are on this team, but Bennett looks aweful. I wouldn't trade him for a draft pick, but if we could get a real good serviceable lineman or another slashing style running back I would pull the trigger.

    Mike
    I am an avid Viking fan, but also am an avid restoration guy of vintage Mopar(Chrysler, Dodge, Plymouth)B bodies

  5. #15
    Burley81 is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    691

    Re: Bennett-wuh?!

    "Vikez4Lyfe" wrote:
    I don't want to trade him.. Memo will probably get hurt and be out for 7 weeks with a minor sprain.. Then who do we fall back to? Bennett is a pretty solid back up.. He didn't look good today with his 2 runs because they were towards the end of the game and the line was stacked.. Not standing up for him just pointing out some facts.. I know he isn't that good but no way should we trade him for so little.. Expecially with Memo's injury history
    Moore's ankle injury wasn't minor last year. He tore something vital, I don't remember though. Injury history? It was one injury.

    Did anyone see that one play today, that like 3 Saints got into the backfield, and Moore made all of them miss and went for a first down. That was nuts!

    Can anyone say mini Barry Sanders?

    Oh wait, I have to change my sig!


  6. #16
    TheAnimal93 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,308

    Re: Bennett-wuh?!

    What the heck is up with Bennett? He was the next Robert Smith supposedly. But he hasnt engaged the other gear and proved that he isnt a flash in the pan as #26 did.

    H-Bday PA, my Clobbering Bro!!
    What is up with OUR guys? havent heard too much of the front line either.

  7. #17
    grpape is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    541

    Re: Bennett-wuh?!

    Please do not lable MM or any other back in the same sentence as Barry Sanders. It's almost like labeling the next MJ. He did well, we will see during the Falcons game just how good he and our line is. I think people are crazy to think that we should trade Bennett for anything either than another back. You'll see, all the backs are going to be needed this season!

    aloha, Derrick

  8. #18
    ultravikingfan's Avatar
    ultravikingfan is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    24,514

    Re: Bennett-wuh?!

    "grpape" wrote:
    Please do not lable MM or any other back in the same sentence as Barry Sanders. It's almost like labeling the next MJ. He did well, we will see during the Falcons game just how good he and our line is. I think people are crazy to think that we should trade Bennett for anything either than another back. You'll see, all the backs are going to be needed this season!

    aloha, Derrick
    Memo is good. Better than Barry.

    (there, they are not the same sentence) :lol:

  9. #19
    grpape is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    541

    Re: Bennett-wuh?!

    Ha Ha very amusing! We'll see how much Barryesque MM is throughout the season. Don't get me wrong, I would rather have a consitent yard gainer rather than one that gets negative to little yardage with the threat to break one with one jaw dropping run.

    aloha, Derrick

  10. #20
    Burley81 is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    691

    Re: Bennett-wuh?!

    "grpape" wrote:
    Ha Ha very amusing! We'll see how much Barryesque MM is throughout the season. Don't get me wrong, I would rather have a consitent yard gainer rather than one that gets negative to little yardage with the threat to break one with one jaw dropping run.

    aloha, Derrick
    Whoa dude, I was being sarcastic. All I was trying to say was that move was Barry Sanders like...


Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. M. Bennett
    By magicci in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: 09-19-2005, 04:21 PM
  2. Bennett
    By ADubya26 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 09-25-2004, 01:00 PM
  3. Bennett out 1 to 3
    By VikingsTw in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-28-2004, 06:18 PM
  4. Bennett...
    By javonwalker84 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-17-2003, 12:28 AM
  5. Bennett?
    By Webby in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-02-2003, 09:03 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •